Perry Ed. Assn. v. Perry Local Educators' Assn
460 U.S. 37 (1983) Cited 2,244 times 3 Legal AnalysesHolding that content-neutral time, place, and manner restrictions on speech must be "narrowly tailored to serve a significant government interest, and leave open ample alternative channels of communication"
Lakewood v. Plain Dealer Publishing Co.
486 U.S. 750 (1988) Cited 1,028 timesHolding that a statute "placing unbridled discretion in the hands of a government official or agency" is unconstitutional
McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Comm'n
514 U.S. 334 (1995) Cited 789 times 4 Legal AnalysesHolding that anonymous speech is constitutionally protected
Cohen v. California
403 U.S. 15 (1971) Cited 1,253 times 3 Legal AnalysesHolding that a jacket bearing the words "Fuck the Draft" is protected speech
United States v. Grace
461 U.S. 171 (1983) Cited 811 timesHolding that because "[t]here is no separation, no fence, and no indication whatever to persons stepping from the street to the curb and sidewalks that serve as the perimeter of the Court grounds that they have entered some special type of enclave," the public sidewalks surrounding the Supreme Court were public fora and noting that "[t]here is nothing to indicate to the public that these sidewalks are part of the Supreme Court grounds or are in any way different from other public sidewalks in the city"
Hague v. C.I.O
307 U.S. 496 (1939) Cited 1,603 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that to establish a claim under the Privileges and Immunities Clause, plaintiffs must allege discrimination on the basis of out-of-state residency
Immuno Ag. v. Moor-Jankowski
77 N.Y.2d 235 (N.Y. 1991) Cited 375 timesHolding that the New York State Constitution independently provides protection for statements of opinion greater than those required by the First Amendment
Mastrovincenzo v. City of New York
435 F.3d 78 (2d Cir. 2006) Cited 229 timesHolding NYC's vendor licensing regime survives intermediate scrutiny because it "in no way precludes plaintiffs from reaching public audiences on the sidewalks generally, or in any of the specific venues where they currently hawk their wares" but rather "[a]t most . . . prohibits plaintiffs, as unlicensed vendors, from personally selling their wares for a profit and at a venue of their choosing"
Bery v. City of New York
97 F.3d 689 (2d Cir. 1996) Cited 241 timesHolding that sale of art and photographs are protected activities
O'Neill v. Oakgrove Constr
71 N.Y.2d 521 (N.Y. 1988) Cited 165 times 1 Legal AnalysesRecognizing a qualified privilege arising under the federal and the state constitutions for non-confidential materials