§Why CasetextPricing

Julie Conason, et al., Respondents,v.Megan Holding, LLC, et al., Appellants.

Brief

32 Cited authorities

  1. Morris v. Dept. of Taxation

    82 N.Y.2d 135 (N.Y. 1993)   Cited 1,418 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "piercing the corporate veil requires a showing that: the owners exercised complete domination of the corporation in respect to the transaction attacked; and that such domination was used to commit a fraud or wrong against the plaintiff which resulted in plaintiff's injury."

  2. East Hamp. Union Free Sch. Dist. v. Sandpebble Build.

    2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 1319 (N.Y. 2011)   Cited 265 times
    Affirming dismissal of alter ego claim

  3. ABN AMRO Bank, N.V. v. MBIA Inc.

    2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 5542 (N.Y. 2011)   Cited 251 times
    Holding that allegations of insolvency support a cause of action under DCL § 274

  4. Schwartz v. Public Administrator

    24 N.Y.2d 65 (N.Y. 1969)   Cited 933 times
    Finding that mutuality is not required for collateral estoppel, as long as the party against whom the doctrine is invoked has had a full opportunity to litigate the issue

  5. Grimm v. State

    2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 7379 (N.Y. 2010)   Cited 245 times
    Vacating DHCR's denial of overcharge petition and remanding to consider fraud allegations and the reliability of the base date rent where the landlord had significantly increased the rent, offered leases without a rent stabilization rider, required tenants to make improvements at their own expense or pay increased rent, and failed to register the apartment for several years until after service of the complaint

  6. Thornton v. Baron

    5 N.Y.3d 175 (N.Y. 2005)   Cited 202 times
    Finding that tenants alleging rent overcharge may evaluate documents exceeding four-year statute of limitations implemented by RSC § 26-516 to prevent landlord's fraud

  7. Berenger v. 261 West LLC

    93 A.D.3d 175 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)   Cited 144 times
    Denying defendant's summary judgment motion on trespass because there were triable issues of act as to whether defendant knew or should have known about a glycol leak and whether that leak was recurring such that the defendant had good reason to expect that glycol would leak again

  8. Gateway I Group, Inc. v. Park Avenue Physicians, P.C.

    62 A.D.3d 141 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)   Cited 138 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 2007-05715. March 17, 2009. APPEAL from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Orazio R. Bellantoni, J.), entered May 17, 2007. The order denied the motion of defendants Park Avenue Health Care Management, Inc., Park Avenue Senior Medicine P.C., Park Avenue Geriatric Management, LLC, and Brad Markowitz pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the amended complaint insofar as asserted against them for failure to state a cause of action. Cozen O'Connor, New York City ( Edward Hayum

  9. Retropolis, Inc. v. 14th Street Development LLC

    17 A.D.3d 209 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)   Cited 127 times
    Applying New York law

  10. Cobalt Partners v. GSC Capital Corp.

    97 A.D.3d 35 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)   Cited 101 times
    Explaining that allegations that corporation used its alter ego to "breach a contractual obligation for personal gain" were sufficient to state a claim for breach of contract