§Why CasetextPricing

The People, Respondent,v.Gregory Lee, Appellant.

Brief

30 Cited authorities

  1. Arizona v. Gant

    556 U.S. 332 (2009)   Cited 3,896 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Fourth Amendment does not permit officers to search every vehicle incident to arrest

  2. Coolidge v. New Hampshire

    403 U.S. 443 (1971)   Cited 7,818 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that police who obtained evidence voluntarily from a suspect's wife did not need a search warrant because the officers exerted no effort to coerce or dominate her and were not obligated to refuse her offer to take the evidence

  3. Wong Sun v. United States

    371 U.S. 471 (1963)   Cited 12,246 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding evidence stemming from Fourth Amendment violations must be excluded from trial as fruit of the poisonous tree

  4. United States v. Ross

    456 U.S. 798 (1982)   Cited 4,149 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding that search under the automobile exception extends only to areas "that may conceal the object of the search"

  5. Colorado v. Bertine

    479 U.S. 367 (1987)   Cited 1,843 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the decision to seize need be "on the basis of something other than suspicion of evidence of criminal activity"

  6. California v. Acevedo

    500 U.S. 565 (1991)   Cited 1,539 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding the Fourth Amendment does not preclude a warrantless search of a container in an automobile where there is probable cause to believe that it contains contraband

  7. People v. De Bour

    40 N.Y.2d 210 (N.Y. 1976)   Cited 2,272 times   6 Legal Analyses
    In People v. LaPene, 352 N.E.2d 562 (N.Y. 1976), the New York Court of Appeals laid out a sliding scale of justifiable police intrusion, short of probable cause to arrest, which specified three distinct levels of intrusion correlating the allowable intensity of police conduct to the nature and weight of the facts precipitating the intrusion.

  8. People v. Bigelow

    66 N.Y.2d 417 (N.Y. 1985)   Cited 854 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Rejecting the "good-faith exception" to the warrant requirement

  9. People v. Robinson

    97 N.Y.2d 341 (N.Y. 2001)   Cited 494 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Declining to distinguish between criminal and traffic violations for the purposes of searches and seizures under New York law

  10. People v. Belton

    55 N.Y.2d 49 (N.Y. 1982)   Cited 339 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding greater protection under state constitution despite similar wording of relevant federal and state search and seizure provision

  11. Section 3362 - [Repealed Effective six months after full cannabis control board created by Cannabis Law has been appointed] and [Repealed Effective 7/5/2028] Lawful medical use

    N.Y. Pub. Health Law § 3362   Cited 1 times   2 Legal Analyses

    1. The possession, acquisition, use, delivery, transfer, transportation, or administration of medical marihuana by a certified patient or designated caregiver possessing a valid registry identification card, for certified medical use, shall be lawful under this title; provided that: (a) the marihuana that may be possessed by a certified patient shall not exceed a thirty day supply of the dosage as determined by the practitioner, consistent with any guidance and regulations issued by the commissioner