Granting summary judgment as the city's arguments were considered speculation and this was "patently inadequate to establish the existence of a factual issue requiring a trial . . ."
No. 89-1857. October 1, 1990, OCTOBER TERM, 1990. Ct. App. Ohio, Richland County. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 55 Ohio App. 3d 78, 562 N. E. 2d 949.
Holding that designating the Health Department to fix option price for purchasing nursing home did not defeat the contract under the definiteness doctrine
260 A.D.2d 201 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999) Cited 316 times
Noting that, when plaintiff failed to oppose a motion for summary judgment, "[e]ven if this Court were to reach the merits, on the record before the Court, the factual allegations of the moving papers, uncontradicted by plaintiff, are sufficient to entitle defendants to judgment dismissing the complaint as a matter of law"
Holding that if “there was a conscious and deliberate intention to discharge liability from all consequences of an accident, the release will be sustained and bar any future claims of previously unknown injuries”
Finding discharged attorney who had contingency fee arrangement with former client had elected to receive contingent percentage fee from incoming attorney