§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of James Holmes, Respondent,v.Jana Winter, Appellant,

Brief

24 Cited authorities

  1. Chambers v. Mississippi

    410 U.S. 284 (1973)   Cited 6,054 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the application of the rule against hearsay to exclude exculpatory testimony violated the defendant's right to present a complete defense because the testimony was reliable

  2. Washington v. Texas

    388 U.S. 14 (1967)   Cited 3,372 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a statute that categorically barred accomplices from testifying for a defendant on trial for the same crime "cannot ... be defended"

  3. Branzburg v. Hayes

    408 U.S. 665 (1972)   Cited 1,822 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that government need not “demonstrate some ‘compelling need’ for a newsman's testimony”

  4. Rodriguez v. United States

    480 U.S. 522 (1987)   Cited 411 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Finding no irreconcilable conflict between a minimum sentence and the "suspension authority" of § 3651

  5. Matter Hearst Corp. v. Clyne

    50 N.Y.2d 707 (N.Y. 1980)   Cited 1,617 times
    Holding that courts are normally precluded from considering questions that, once alive, have become moot by change of circumstances

  6. New York v. O'Neill

    359 U.S. 1 (1959)   Cited 89 times
    Finding that Florida courts had immediate personal jurisdiction over a nonresident by virtue of his presence within the state

  7. Ehrlich-Bober v. University

    49 N.Y.2d 574 (N.Y. 1980)   Cited 139 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Upholding personal jurisdiction over defendant public university located in Texas based upon use of a correspondent bank in New York to carry out a transaction with plaintiff New York securities dealer where other contacts existed—i.e., the disputed “reverse repurchase” agreements involved phone calls and visits to plaintiff's office in New York, and the placing of a securities order and delivery and payment in that office

  8. Debra v. Janice

    2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 3755 (N.Y. 2010)   Cited 53 times
    Reaffirming its prior rejection of judicially created de facto parenthood and refusing to exercise its equitable powers to do so absent legislative action

  9. In re Grand Jury Subpoena, Judith Miller

    438 F.3d 1141 (D.C. Cir. 2005)   Cited 59 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding reservation in U.S. Attorney's Manual guidelines which "expressly state that they do `not create or recognize any legally enforceable right in any person'"

  10. McKevitt v. Pallasch

    339 F.3d 530 (7th Cir. 2003)   Cited 52 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Upholding district court order pursuant to § 1782 that required production of reporters' tape recordings

  11. Section Amendment VI - Rights of Accused in Criminal Prosecutions

    U.S. Const. amend. VI   Cited 28,954 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Granting the accused the right to be tried "by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed."

  12. Section Amendment XIV - Rights Guaranteed: Privileges and Immunities of Citizenship, Due Process, and Equal Protection

    U.S. Const. amend. XIV   Cited 11,710 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Containing both a Due Process Clause and an Equal Protection Clause

  13. Section 12 - Rights of persons accused of crime

    N.Y. Civ. Rights Law § 12   Cited 205 times
    Guaranteeing right to a public trial in state bill of rights

  14. Section 79-H - Special provisions relating to persons employed by, or connected with, news media

    N.Y. Civ. Rights Law § 79-H   Cited 187 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Applying New York's Shield Law only to "professional journalists and newscasters"