§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of Patrolmen's Benevolent Association of the City of New York, Inc., et al., Appellants,v.City of New York, et al., Respondents.

Brief

8 Cited authorities

  1. Parochial v. Board of Educ

    60 N.Y.2d 539 (N.Y. 1983)   Cited 826 times
    Holding that § 3813's notice of claim requirement "is not satisfied by presentment to any other individual or body"

  2. Silverman

    61 N.Y.2d 299 (N.Y. 1984)   Cited 564 times
    Noting that an arbitrator's “award will not be vacated even though the court concludes that his interpretation of the agreement misconstrues or disregards its plain meaning or misapplies substantive rules of law, unless it is violative of a strong public policy, or is totally irrational”

  3. Braschi v. Stahl Assocs. Co.

    74 N.Y.2d 201 (N.Y. 1989)   Cited 222 times
    Holding that, for purposes of rent regulation, gay couple was a "family"

  4. In re Nationwide Gen. Ins. Co. v. Inv'rs Ins. Co. of Am.

    37 N.Y.2d 91 (N.Y. 1975)   Cited 298 times
    Holding that, when there is a broad arbitration agreement, courts focus only on an "initial screening process" to determine whether the parties have agreed that the subject matter under dispute should be submitted to arbitration and if so, "the court's inquiry is ended"

  5. SG Cowen Securities Corp. v. Messih

    224 F.3d 79 (2d Cir. 2000)   Cited 40 times
    Stating that "to 'entertain' an application 'only upon' a particular 'ground' renders that ground an indispensable but not necessarily exclusive element of a successful application."

  6. Matter of Aaron J

    80 N.Y.2d 402 (N.Y. 1992)   Cited 37 times
    In Matter of Aaron J. (80 N.Y.2d 402), in affirming the Family Court and the Appellate Division, the Court of Appeals noted that a referral for adjustment services, made pursuant to Family Court Act § 308.1, tolled, for a period of up to 120 days, the time frame for starting a fact-finding hearing required by Family Court Act § 340.1 when the referral was ordered pursuant to Family Court Act § 320.6.

  7. Matter of Wilaka Constr. Co.

    17 N.Y.2d 195 (N.Y. 1966)   Cited 32 times

    Argued February 15, 1966 Decided March 31, 1966 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, WILLIAM LYMAN, J. Paul W. Hessel, Harry Levy, Michael M. Cohen and I. Stanley Stein for appellant. Joseph Feldman and Irwin H. Rosenberg for respondent. KEATING, J. By permission of this court, the New York City Housing Authority appeals from an order of the Appellate Division, First Department, unanimously affirming, without opinion, an order of the Supreme Court

  8. Section 600.10 - Format and content of records, appendices and briefs

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 600.10   Cited 11 times

    (a) Form and size. (1) Generally; paper and page size. Records, appendices and briefs shall be reproduced by any method that produces a permanent, legible, black on white copy and shall be on a good grade of white, opaque, unglazed recycled paper that satisfies the requirements of subdivision (e) of this section. Paper shall measure vertically 11 inches on the bound edge and horizontally 81/2 inches. The clerk may refuse to accept for filing a paper which is not legible or otherwise does not comply