24 Cited authorities

  1. Olmstead v. United States

    277 U.S. 438 (1928)   Cited 1,573 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a wiretap was not a search because “[t]here was no entry of the houses or offices of the defendants”
  2. Parkview Assocs v. City of New York

    71 N.Y.2d 274 (N.Y. 1988)   Cited 291 times
    Holding that "`[e]stoppel is not available against a local government unit for the purpose of ratifying an administrative error,'" and such an administrative error does not confer rights contrary to the zoning laws
  3. Balbuena v. IDR Realty LLC

    2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 1248 (N.Y. 2006)   Cited 142 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "plaintiffs' status as aliens who are not legally authorized to work in the United States" did not preclude their recovery of lost earning in their suit to recover for injuries sustained as a result of defendants' purported violations of state Labor Law
  4. Barker v. Kallash

    63 N.Y.2d 19 (N.Y. 1984)   Cited 141 times
    Holding that attempting to construct a pipe bomb is sufficiently severe
  5. Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n of City of New York, Inc. v. New York State Public Employment Relations Board

    2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 2288 (N.Y. 2006)   Cited 62 times
    Noting that "the application of the Taylor Law to particular facts [is] an area in which PERB is entitled to deference"
  6. Town of Wallkill v. Civil Serv. Emps. Ass'n, Inc.

    2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 7146 (N.Y. 2012)   Cited 22 times
    Holding that although Wallkill has been bargaining over discipline for 12 years, it is a prohibited subject
  7. State v. Barrett

    768 A.2d 929 (R.I. 2001)   Cited 27 times
    In State v. Barrett, 768 A.2d 929, 940 (R.I. 2001), the defendant had asserted diminished capacity as a defense to the mens rea element of second-degree murder.
  8. Manhasset Un. v. N.Y. State Pub

    61 A.D.3d 1231 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)   Cited 16 times

    No. 505344. April 23, 2009. Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Public Employment Relations Board which held that petitioner violated Civil Service Law § 209-a (1) (d) by transferring unit work to outside contractors. Seyfarth Shaw, L.L.P., New York City (Peter A. Walker of counsel), for petitioner. David P. Quinn, New York State Public Employment Relations Board, Albany

  9. Vill. Taxi Corp. v. Beltre

    91 A.D.3d 92 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)   Cited 12 times

    2011-11-22 VILLAGE TAXI CORP., et al., appellants, v. Ramon BELTRE, et al., respondents. Appeal by the plaintiffs, in an action to recover damages, inter alia, in effect, for fraudulent inducement and breach of contract, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court (Alan D. Scheinkman, J.), dated August 3, 2009, and entered in Westchester County, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendants Carlos Pereyra and Leonardo Coronado, and that

  10. State v. O'Brien

    774 A.2d 89 (R.I. 2001)   Cited 22 times
    Applying the same standard to RI wiretap act defendants
  11. Section 5733 - Expeditious travel

    5 U.S.C. § 5733   Cited 1 times

    The travel of an employee shall be by the most expeditious means of transportation practicable and shall be commensurate with the nature and purpose of the duties of the employee requiring such travel. 5 U.S.C. § 5733 Added Pub. L. 90-206, title II, §222(c)(1), Dec. 16, 1967, 81 Stat. 641. STATUTORY NOTES AND RELATED SUBSIDIARIES EFFECTIVE DATESection effective thirty days after Dec. 16, 1967, see section 220(a)(4) of Pub. L. 90-206 set out as an Effective Date of 1967 Amendment note under section

  12. Section 500.21 - Motions-general procedures

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 500.21

    (a) Return date. Regardless whether the court is in session, motions shall be returnable on a Monday or, if Monday is a legal holiday, the first business day of the week unless otherwise provided by statute, order to show cause or stipulation so ordered by a judge of the court. Motions shall be submitted without oral argument, unless the court directs otherwise. No adjournments shall be permitted other than in those limited instances provided by statute (CPLR 321[c] and 1022). (b) Notice and service