§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of Town of Islip, Appellant,v.New York State Public Employment Relations Board, et al., Respondents.

Brief

26 Cited authorities

  1. Albany Bldrs. v. Guilderland

    74 N.Y.2d 372 (N.Y. 1989)   Cited 159 times
    Holding Guilderland's local law was preempted by New York state law which provided a comprehensive scheme for funding road construction

  2. In Matter of Ridge Road Fire Dist. v. Schiano

    2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 2720 (N.Y. 2011)   Cited 69 times

    No. 55. Argued February 16, 2011. Decided April 5, 2011 APPEAL, by permission of the Court of Appeals, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, entered November 13, 2009. The Appellate Division (1) reversed, on the law, a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Evelyn Frazee, J.), entered in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, which had (a) granted the petition seeking to annul the determination of respondent Michael

  3. Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n of City of New York, Inc. v. New York State Public Employment Relations Board

    2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 2288 (N.Y. 2006)   Cited 62 times
    Noting that "the application of the Taylor Law to particular facts [is] an area in which PERB is entitled to deference"

  4. Cohen v. Bd. of Appeal, Vil. of Saddle Rock

    100 N.Y.2d 395 (N.Y. 2003)   Cited 54 times
    Concluding that a village may not supersede provisions of the Village Law establishing standards for area variance review where the Legislature intended to occupy the field and establish uniform standards

  5. Board of Education of City School District v. New York State Public Employment Relations Board

    75 N.Y.2d 660 (N.Y. 1990)   Cited 65 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that "in a few instances, however, what might otherwise be negotiable terms and conditions of employment are prohibited from being collectively bargained. For example, a statute may direct that certain action be taken by the employer, leaving no room for negotiation."

  6. Chenango Forks Cent. Sch. Dist. v. State Pub. Emp't Relations Bd.

    2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 4039 (N.Y. 2013)   Cited 27 times

    No. 104 06-06-2013 In the Matter of Chenango Forks Central School District, Appellant, v. New York State Public Employment Relations Board et al., Respondents. Lars P. Mead, for appellant. David P. Quinn, for respondent New York State Public Employment Relations Board. Frederick K. Reich, for respondent Chenango Forks Teachers Association. READ Lars P. Mead, for appellant. David P. Quinn, for respondent New York State Public Employment Relations Board. Frederick K. Reich, for respondent Chenango

  7. Town of Wallkill v. Civil Serv. Emps. Ass'n, Inc.

    2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 7146 (N.Y. 2012)   Cited 22 times
    Holding that although Wallkill has been bargaining over discipline for 12 years, it is a prohibited subject

  8. Manhasset Un. v. N.Y. State Pub

    61 A.D.3d 1231 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)   Cited 16 times

    No. 505344. April 23, 2009. Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Public Employment Relations Board which held that petitioner violated Civil Service Law § 209-a (1) (d) by transferring unit work to outside contractors. Seyfarth Shaw, L.L.P., New York City (Peter A. Walker of counsel), for petitioner. David P. Quinn, New York State Public Employment Relations Board, Albany

  9. City of N.Y. v. State Pub. Emp't Relations Bd.

    103 A.D.3d 145 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)   Cited 11 times

    2012-12-27 In the Matter of CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Appellants, v. NEW YORK STATE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD et al., Respondents. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York City (Elizabeth S. Natrella of counsel), for appellants. David P. Quinn, New York State Public Employment Relations Board, Albany, for New York State Public Employment Relations Board, respondent. McCARTHY Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York City (Elizabeth S. Natrella of counsel), for appellants.

  10. City of Amsterdam v. Helsby

    37 N.Y.2d 19 (N.Y. 1975)   Cited 52 times

    Argued March 25, 1975 Decided June 5, 1975 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Montgomery County, HAROLD R. SODEN, J. Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, FRANK R. BAYGER, J. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (John Q. Driscoll and Ruth Kessler Toch of counsel), for Robert D. Helsby and others, appellants in the first above-entitled action. Dominick Tocci and William Pozefsky for remaining appellant in the first above-entitled action. Joseph Jacobs for respondent in the first above-entitled action