§Why CasetextPricing

Estate of Helen Del Terzo, et al., Respondents,v.33 Fifth Avenue Owners Corp., Appellant.

Brief

22 Cited authorities

  1. People v. Mills

    1 N.Y.3d 269 (N.Y. 2003)   Cited 405 times
    Finding depraved indifference murder for the drowning of a twelve year old

  2. Levandusky v. One Fifth Avenue Apartment Corp.

    75 N.Y.2d 530 (N.Y. 1990)   Cited 605 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "[s]o long as the board acts for the purposes of the cooperative, within the scope of its authority and in good faith, courts will not substitute their judgment for the board's

  3. Buttitta v. Greenwich House Co-op. Apartments

    11 A.D.3d 250 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)   Cited 20 times
    In Buttitta, the lower court noted that plaintiffs, all shareholders, brought an action asserting seven causes of action seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against their residential cooperative corporation.

  4. Matter of Augenblick v. Town of Cortlandt

    66 N.Y.2d 775 (N.Y. 1985)   Cited 33 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the uniformity requirement was violated by a zoning ordinance that singled out one property to permit a use forbidden for all other parcels in the district

  5. In re Bernard Cylich

    74 A.D.3d 646 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)   Cited 6 times

    June 22, 2010. Proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of Supreme Court, Bronx County [Norma Ruiz, J.], entered March 2, 2010), challenging respondent's determination that petitioners were not qualified candidates for election to respondent's board of directors, unanimously dismissed, without costs, on the ground that two persons elected to the board of directors as a result of petitioners' disqualification are necessary parties without whose presence the

  6. Rosenthal v. One Hudson Park, Inc.

    269 A.D.2d 144 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)   Cited 15 times

    February 3, 2000 Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louise Gruner Gans, J.), entered July 9, 1998, which granted plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment to the extent of dismissing defendant's "business judgment rule" defense but denied the motion insofar as it sought a declaration that certain preconditions for consent set by defendant cooperative corporation were unreasonable as a matter of law, and denied in its entirety defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint

  7. Stowe v. 19 East 88th Street, Inc.

    257 A.D.2d 355 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)   Cited 14 times
    In Stowe, by reversing the First Department, the Court found that Stowe had stated a cause of action and in Castleman, that summary judgment was not indicated.

  8. Gleckel v. 49 W. 12 Tenants

    52 A.D.3d 469 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)   Cited 4 times

    No. 2007-11433. June 3, 2008. In an action to recover damages for breach of contract based on the defendants' refusal to consent to the purchase of a cooperative apartment, the defendants appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCormack, J.), dated November 13, 2007, as denied their cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint except to the extent of dismissing the demand for punitive damages, and the plaintiffs cross-appeal from so much of the same order

  9. Arkport Staff United v. Arkport Central School District

    79 A.D.3d 1762 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

    No. CA 10-01525. December 30, 2010. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Steuben County (Peter C. Bradstreet, A.J.), entered March 25, 2010. The order denied the motion of defendants to dismiss the complaint. HOGAN, SARZYNSKI, LYNCH, SUROWKA DEWIND, LLP, JOHNSON CITY (AMY J. LUCENTI OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. JAMES R. SANDNER, LATHAM (ROBERT T. REILLY OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS. Before: Centra, J.P., Lindley, Sconiers, Green and Gorski, JJ. It is hereby ordered that

  10. Hugh Grant Gardens HDFC v. Rodriguez

    28 Misc. 3d 1210 (N.Y. Civ. Ct. 2010)

    July 19, 2010. Kraus, J. Condominiums and Cooperatives — Transfer of Shares — Denial of Transfer to Family Member Who is Not Financially Responsible as Defined in Governing Proprietary Lease.