No. 121. Argued June 3, 2008. Decided June 26, 2008. APPEAL, by permission of the Court of Appeals, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, entered June 21, 2007. The Appellate Division affirmed a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, which had ruled that claimant was not entitled to additional workers' compensation benefits pursuant to Workers' Compensation Law § 15 (3) (v). Matter of Ramroop v Flexo-Craft Print, Inc., 41 AD3d 1055, affirmed
Nos. 2006-01859, 2006-07521. July 10, 2007. In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants Peter Pepe, Jr., and Laurie Pepe appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Douglass, J.), dated January 17, 2006, as denied as premature that branch of their motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them, and (2) an order of the same court dated June 21, 2006, as denied that
Argued January 10, 1952 Decided April 17, 1952 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, BOTEIN, J. Clifton F. Weidlich for appellant. George Trosk for respondent. FROESSEL, J. In an action upon a separation agreement executed on July 1, 1932, whereunder defendant agreed to pay plaintiff on and after February 1, 1933, $75 per month during her lifetime (unless she remarried), she alleges the breach of that agreement by defendant from June 1, 1935, to September 1, 1949. We
Argued May 21, 1940 Decided July 24, 1940 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department. Chester J. Winslow for appellants. John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General ( Roy Wiedersum of counsel), for State Industrial Board, respondent. SEARS, J. Claimant seeks an award under the Workmen's Compensation Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 67) on behalf of herself and her infant daughter for the death of her husband. The decedent died from an injury which he received while working on a highway for