§Why CasetextPricing

The People, Respondent,v.Kaity Marshall, Appellant.

Brief

36 Cited authorities

  1. Brady v. Maryland

    373 U.S. 83 (1963)   Cited 43,302 times   133 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the prosecution violates due process when it suppresses material, favorable evidence

  2. State v. Henderson

    208 N.J. 208 (N.J. 2011)   Cited 703 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding a jury instruction on cross-racial identification should be given whenever cross-racial identification is in issue at trial

  3. People v. Peque

    2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 7651 (N.Y. 2013)   Cited 624 times
    Holding that New York trial courts must inform the defendant of the immigration consequences of pleading guilty to a felony and that a failure to do so could provide a basis for withdrawing or vacating the guilty plea

  4. People v. Chipp

    75 N.Y.2d 327 (N.Y. 1990)   Cited 1,102 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that under the circumstances presented therein, defendant could not call the complaining witness at a pretrial suppression motion

  5. Watkins v. Sowders

    449 U.S. 341 (1981)   Cited 364 times
    Holding that the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment does not require a per se rule that a hearing outside the presence of the jury be conducted whenever a defendant challenges the admissibility of a witness's identification

  6. People v. Rodriguez

    79 N.Y.2d 445 (N.Y. 1992)   Cited 641 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that where "a citizen identification [is] `merely confirmatory' . . . that the People [bear the burden of showing] that the protagonists are known to one another, or [if] there is no mutual relationship, that the witness knows defendant so well as to be impervious to police suggestion."

  7. People v. Gissendanner

    48 N.Y.2d 543 (N.Y. 1979)   Cited 736 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Gissendanner, the court reviewed a lower court's denial of a defendant's request to issue a subpoena for the police personnel files of prosecution witnesses.

  8. People v. Concepcion

    2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 5110 (N.Y. 2011)   Cited 224 times
    Noting that New York Criminal Procedure Law Section 470.15 bars the Appellate Division "from affirming a judgment, sentence or order on a ground not decided adversely to the appellant by the trial court"

  9. People v. LeGrand

    2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 2588 (N.Y. 2007)   Cited 205 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that there was insufficient evidence to confirm that the principles expounded by the defense expert witness on weapon focus were generally accepted by the relevant scientific community

  10. People v. Adams

    53 N.Y.2d 241 (N.Y. 1981)   Cited 397 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the state's due-process requirements require per se exclusion of unnecessarily suggestive showups

  11. Section 500.23 - Amicus curiae relief

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 500.23   Cited 3 times

    Any non-party other than the Attorney General seeking to file an amicus brief on an appeal, certified question or motion for leave to appeal must obtain permission by motion. Potential amici seeking information are encouraged to contact the clerk's office by telephone during business hours. Information on the calendar status of appeals and certified questions, court session dates and appropriate return dates for amicus motions also is available on the court's website. (a)Motions for amicus curiae