444 U.S. 11 (1979) Cited 1,332 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that Congress did not provide a private right of action for § 80b-6 because the statute expressly provided other means of enforcing compliance with its terms
478 U.S. 221 (1986) Cited 562 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that plaintiffs "undoubtedly have alleged a sufficient `injury in fact' in that the whale watching and studying of their members will be adversely affected by continued whale harvesting"
Holding that parents are entitled to tuition reimbursement when "it appears that the proposed IEP was inadequate to afford the child an appropriate public education, and that the private education services obtained by the parents were appropriate to the child's needs"
Stating that failure to raise challenges to FEIS under state environmental law during proceedings could not be overlooked when determining whether failure to discuss issue in FEIS was reasonable
In Matter of Dairylea Coop. v Walkley (38 N.Y.2d 6), we set forth a two-part test for determining when a party has standing to contest administrative action.
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 7762 (N.Y. 2013) Cited 114 times
Stating that New York courts have "declined to recognize a private right of action in instances where ‘the Legislature specifically considered and expressly provided for enforcement mechanisms’ in the statute itself" (quoting Mark G. v. Sabol , 93 N.Y.2d 710, 720, 695 N.Y.S.2d 730, 717 N.E.2d 1067 (1999) )
Holding HUD's pattern of failure "affirmatively ... to further" Title VII's fair housing policy was reviewable as an "abdication of [HUD's] statutory responsibilities"
20 U.S.C. § 1415 Cited 7,162 times 17 Legal Analyses
Holding that "before the filing of a civil action . . . seeking relief that is also available under [the IDEA], the [IDEA's administrative] procedures . . . shall be exhausted"
20 U.S.C. § 1412 Cited 3,323 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding the SEA "responsible for ensuring that . . . the requirements of [the IDEA] are met" and "all educational programs . . . meet the educational standards of the [SEA]"
Granting FTC the power to "make rules and regulations for the purpose of carrying out the provisions of this [Act]," 15 U.S.C. § 46(g) (West Supp. 1986)
Noting that, if the school "is unable to obtain the participation of the parent in the resolution meeting after reasonable efforts have been made," the school "may . . . request that a hearing officer dismiss the parent's due process complaint"