26 Cited authorities

Batson v. Kentucky
476 U.S. 79 (1986) Cited 15,232 times 61 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Equal Protection Clause applies to the use of peremptory strikes
Morrissey v. Brewer
408 U.S. 471 (1972) Cited 10,672 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that parolees "must have an opportunity to be heard and to show . . . that circumstances in mitigation suggest that the violation does not warrant revocation"
Hernandez v. New York
500 U.S. 352 (1991) Cited 3,862 times 17 Legal Analyses
Holding that evaluation of a prosecutor's credibility "lies `peculiarly within a trial judge's province'"
Purkett v. Elem
514 U.S. 765 (1995) Cited 3,007 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding a Court of Appeals erred by combining Batson’s second and third steps
United States v. Knights
534 U.S. 112 (2001) Cited 1,807 times 9 Legal Analyses
Holding that a "warrantless search . . ., supported by reasonable suspicion and authorized by a condition of probation, was reasonable . . . [under] the Fourth Amendment"
Samson v. California
547 U.S. 843 (2006) Cited 1,344 times 21 Legal Analyses
Holding that a similarly worded condition imposed on all California parolees did not violate the Fourth Amendment, even without the reasonable suspicion restriction
Griffin v. Wisconsin
483 U.S. 868 (1987) Cited 1,541 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that supervision is a special need of the state "permitting a degree of impingent upon privacy that would not be constitutional if applied to the public at large."
Holland v. Illinois
493 U.S. 474 (1990) Cited 441 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that a defendant of one race has standing to raise a Sixth Amendment challenge to the exclusion of individuals of another race from his jury, and noting that this rule aligns with the goal of Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 in "assuring the selection of a qualified and unbiased jury"
People v. Hecker
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 8766 (N.Y. 2010) Cited 198 times
Holding that mistaken denial of a peremptory challenge "under New York law mandates automatic reversal," despite the United States Supreme Court's holding in Rivera
People v. Payne
88 N.Y.2d 172 (N.Y. 1996) Cited 266 times
In Payne, the Court of Appeals held that a trial court may render a ruling of purposeful discrimination "without hearing more discussion from either or each side" after the striking party has proffered its race-neutral reasons.

The People, Respondent,v.Everett B. McMillan, Appellant.

26 Cited authorities

Holding that the Equal Protection Clause applies to the use of peremptory strikes

Holding that parolees "must have an opportunity to be heard and to show . . . that circumstances in mitigation suggest that the violation does not warrant revocation"

Holding that evaluation of a prosecutor's credibility "lies `peculiarly within a trial judge's province'"

Holding a Court of Appeals erred by combining Batson’s second and third steps

Holding that a "warrantless search . . ., supported by reasonable suspicion and authorized by a condition of probation, was reasonable . . . [under] the Fourth Amendment"

Holding that a similarly worded condition imposed on all California parolees did not violate the Fourth Amendment, even without the reasonable suspicion restriction

Holding that supervision is a special need of the state "permitting a degree of impingent upon privacy that would not be constitutional if applied to the public at large."

Holding that a defendant of one race has standing to raise a Sixth Amendment challenge to the exclusion of individuals of another race from his jury, and noting that this rule aligns with the goal of Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 in "assuring the selection of a qualified and unbiased jury"

Holding that mistaken denial of a peremptory challenge "under New York law mandates automatic reversal," despite the United States Supreme Court's holding in Rivera

In Payne, the Court of Appeals held that a trial court may render a ruling of purposeful discrimination "without hearing more discussion from either or each side" after the striking party has proffered its race-neutral reasons.