27 Cited authorities

  1. United States v. Santos

    553 U.S. 507 (2008)   Cited 866 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that when the government alleges that the defendant laundered the "proceeds" of an illegal gambling business, the government must prove that the laundering transactions involved the profits of the business, rather than its gross receipts
  2. Clark v. Martinez

    543 U.S. 371 (2005)   Cited 794 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that § 1231 does not authorize indefinite detention
  3. Brown v. Gardner

    513 U.S. 115 (1994)   Cited 427 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the statute, as then in force, contained no requirement of fault
  4. People v. Finnegan

    85 N.Y.2d 53 (N.Y. 1995)   Cited 196 times
    In Finnegan, the Court of Appeals refused to read into another section of the VTL a requirement that the police affirmatively take certain steps, reasoning that because the Legislature did not impose such an obligation, the courts should not do so in the Legislature's place. Finnegan, 647 N.E.2d at 760-761.
  5. People v. Santi

    3 N.Y.3d 234 (N.Y. 2004)   Cited 116 times

    122. Argued September 9, 2004. Decided October 21, 2004. Appeal, in the first above-entitled action, by permission of an Associate Judge of the Court of Appeals, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, entered September 8, 2003. The Appellate Division affirmed a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Laura D. Blackburne, J.), which had convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of unauthorized practice of medicine (four counts). APPEAL

  6. People v. Shapiro

    50 N.Y.2d 747 (N.Y. 1980)   Cited 152 times
    Holding that "on a new trial, the only way in which the prejudice created by the prosecutor's threats can be dispelled would be to require that the defendant's witnesses be granted immunity as a condition to subjecting the defendant to a new trial"
  7. Pultz v. Economakis

    890 N.E.2d 880 (N.Y. 2008)   Cited 56 times
    In Pultz v Economakis, 10 NY3d 542, cited by the attorney for plaintiffs, a couple sought to evict the tenants in 15 rent-stabilized apartments from an East Village tenement in order to convert the 60-room tenement into their own single-family home containing a gym, a playroom, a library, five bedrooms and six bathrooms.
  8. People v. Ayala

    75 N.Y.2d 422 (N.Y. 1990)   Cited 94 times
    In People v Ayala (75 NY2d 422) the trial court adopted a "more expansive reading" (id. at 429) of CPL 670.10, so as to permit the receipt into evidence at trial of testimony given by a witness at a prior proceeding, a suppression hearing, even though that proceeding was "not literally within any of the three categories of prior proceedings delineated in the statute" authorizing the receipt of prior testimony (id. at 428).
  9. Morales v. County of Nassau

    94 N.Y.2d 218 (N.Y. 1999)   Cited 52 times
    Rejecting expressio unius as a basis for “creat[ing] an entirely new exemption that is not suggested by the language of the statute or its history”
  10. People v. Litto

    872 N.E.2d 848 (N.Y. 2007)   Cited 39 times
    Noting that "a prosecutor must show impairment by alcohol to prove a violation of subdivision 1 — resulting in a traffic infraction," and that "[s]ubdivision 1 is a lesser-included offense of subdivisions 2 and 3"