§Why CasetextPricing

The People, Respondent,v.John Andujar, Appellant.

Brief

27 Cited authorities

  1. United States v. Santos

    553 U.S. 507 (2008)   Cited 951 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that when the government alleges that the defendant laundered the "proceeds" of an illegal gambling business, the government must prove that the laundering transactions involved the profits of the business, rather than its gross receipts

  2. Clark v. Martinez

    543 U.S. 371 (2005)   Cited 921 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that § 1231 does not authorize indefinite detention

  3. Brown v. Gardner

    513 U.S. 115 (1994)   Cited 491 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the statute, as then in force, contained no requirement of fault

  4. People v. Finnegan

    85 N.Y.2d 53 (N.Y. 1995)   Cited 241 times
    In Finnegan, the Court of Appeals refused to read into another section of the VTL a requirement that the police affirmatively take certain steps, reasoning that because the Legislature did not impose such an obligation, the courts should not do so in the Legislature's place. Finnegan, 647 N.E.2d at 760-761.

  5. People v. Santi

    3 N.Y.3d 234 (N.Y. 2004)   Cited 159 times
    In People v. Santi, 3 N.Y.3d 234, 243, 785 N.Y.S.2d 405, 818 N.E.2d 1146 (2004), the Court of Appeals reaffirmed the long established policy that, " '[i]n implementing a statute, the courts must of necessity examine the purpose of the statute and determine the intention of the Legislature.' " citing, Willams v. Williams, 23 N.Y.2d 592, 598, 298 N.Y.S.2d 473, 246 N.E.2d 333 (1969).

  6. People v. Shapiro

    50 N.Y.2d 747 (N.Y. 1980)   Cited 161 times
    Holding that "on a new trial, the only way in which the prejudice created by the prosecutor's threats can be dispelled would be to require that the defendant's witnesses be granted immunity as a condition to subjecting the defendant to a new trial"

  7. Pultz v. Economakis

    2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 4900 (N.Y. 2008)   Cited 59 times
    In Pultz v Economakis, 10 NY3d 542, cited by the attorney for plaintiffs, a couple sought to evict the tenants in 15 rent-stabilized apartments from an East Village tenement in order to convert the 60-room tenement into their own single-family home containing a gym, a playroom, a library, five bedrooms and six bathrooms.

  8. People v. Ayala

    75 N.Y.2d 422 (N.Y. 1990)   Cited 96 times
    Construing the opportunity for cross-examination as “an additional, constitutional requirement” for the receipt of testimony otherwise satisfying CPL 670.10

  9. People v. Litto

    2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 5582 (N.Y. 2007)   Cited 48 times
    Noting that "a prosecutor must show impairment by alcohol to prove a violation of subdivision 1 — resulting in a traffic infraction," and that "[s]ubdivision 1 is a lesser-included offense of subdivisions 2 and 3"

  10. Morales v. County of Nassau

    94 N.Y.2d 218 (N.Y. 1999)   Cited 55 times
    Rejecting expressio unius as a basis for “creat[ing] an entirely new exemption that is not suggested by the language of the statute or its history”