§Why CasetextPricing

The People, Appellant-Respondent,v.Matthew A. Davis, Respondent-Appellant.

Brief

2 Cited authorities

  1. People v. Reome

    2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 5283 (N.Y. 2010)   Cited 157 times
    Rejecting Hudson and holding that "harmonizing evidence may provide a substantial basis for crediting accomplice testimony"

  2. People v. Cyrus

    48 A.D.3d 150 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)   Cited 27 times
    In People v. Cyrus, 48 A.D.3d 150, 159, 848 N.Y.S.2d 67 (1st Dept. 2007), lv denied 10 N.Y.3d 763, 854 N.Y.S.2d 325, 883 N.E.2d 1260 [2008]), the First Department stated that a police officer's testimony regarding a poor quality videotape depicting a theft at a Duane Reade store would "likely [be] inadmissible" because it would violate the best evidence rule.