§Why CasetextPricing

Mid-Hudson Valley Federal Credit Union, Appellant,v.Quartararo & Lois, PLLC et al., Respondents.

Brief

15 Cited authorities

  1. Leon v. Martinez

    84 N.Y.2d 83 (N.Y. 1994)   Cited 9,619 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the allegations in the complaint and the supporting affidavits were adequate to withstand a motion to dismiss

  2. Goldman v. Metropolitan Life

    2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 8846 (N.Y. 2005)   Cited 657 times
    Holding that "there was no unjust enrichment because the matter is controlled by contract"

  3. Morone v. Morone

    50 N.Y.2d 481 (N.Y. 1980)   Cited 988 times
    In Morone, the New York Court of Appeals expressly reaffirmed the "long accepted... concept that an express agreement between unmarried persons living together is as enforceable as though they were not living together... provided only that illicit sexual relations were not 'part of the consideration of the contract'" (citations omitted).Morone, 429 N.Y.S.2d at 594, 413 N.E.2d at 1156.

  4. Howard Leder v. Marshall Spiegel

    2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 5588 (N.Y. 2007)   Cited 230 times
    Applying "but-for" causation to legal malpractice

  5. Johnson v. Proskauer Rose LLP

    129 A.D.3d 59 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)   Cited 84 times
    Finding plaintiffs adequately alleged fraud where they alleged defendants pressured them into a tax avoidance scheme to preserve a lucrative arrangement with a client

  6. White of Lake George, Inc. v. Bell

    251 A.D.2d 777 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)   Cited 51 times
    Holding that fraud claims duplicate professional negligence claims when the plaintiff alleges only that a professional endeavored to "conceal[] or fail[ed] to disclose [his] own malpractice" but that "a fraud claim is asserted in connection with charges of professional malpractice ... is sustainable ... [if] it is premised upon one or more affirmative, intentional misrepresentations"

  7. Carl v. Cohen

    55 A.D.3d 478 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)   Cited 33 times
    Affirming dismissal of fraud claim as duplicative since claim failed to allege damages "separate and distinct" from malpractice claim

  8. Benishai v. Epstein

    116 A.D.3d 726 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)   Cited 21 times

    2014-04-9 Jack BENISHAI, appellant, v. Charles I. EPSTEIN, etc., respondent. Howard Benjamin, New York, N.Y., for appellant. Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP, Hawthorne, N.Y. (Lisa L. Shrewsberry of counsel) for respondent. REINALDO E. RIVERA Howard Benjamin, New York, N.Y., for appellant. Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP, Hawthorne, N.Y. (Lisa L. Shrewsberry of counsel) for respondent. REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P., MARK C. DILLON, SHERI S. ROMAN, and ROBERT J. MILLER, JJ. In an action

  9. Hyman v. Burgess

    125 A.D.3d 1213 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)   Cited 14 times

    02-26-2015 Marita E. HYMAN, Appellant, v. Susan BURGESS, Respondent. Marita E. Hyman, West Edmeston, appellant pro se. Susan Burgess, Hamilton, Ohio, respondent pro se. DEVINE, J. Marita E. Hyman, West Edmeston, appellant pro se. Susan Burgess, Hamilton, Ohio, respondent pro se. Before: LAHTINEN, J.P., GARRY, ROSE and DEVINE, JJ. Opinion DEVINE, J. Appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court (Cerio Jr., J.), entered May 2, 2013 in Madison County, which, among other things, denied plaintiff's motion

  10. Burke v. Sills

    83 A.D.3d 1413 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)   Cited 8 times

    No. CA 10-01419. April 1, 2011. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (David Michael Barry, J.), entered April 12, 2010. The order, among other things, denied in part plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment. It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. COSTELLO, COONEY FEARON, PLLC, SYRACUSE (JENNIFER L. NUHFER OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS. GATES ADAMS, P.C., ROCHESTER (MICHAEL STEINBERG OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS