§Why CasetextPricing

Pinnacle Advertising and Marketing Group, INc. v. Pinnacle Advertising and Marketing Group, LLC

MOTION for clarification 232 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief Regarding Order Excluding Testimony of Rob Wallace

5 Cited authorities

  1. Cook ex Rel. Tessier v. Sheriff Monroe Cnty

    402 F.3d 1092 (11th Cir. 2005)   Cited 876 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a sheriff's decisions regarding the training and supervision of their officers are discretionary functions

  2. Michigan Millers Mut. Ins. Corp. v. Benfield

    140 F.3d 915 (11th Cir. 1998)   Cited 72 times
    Holding that an insurer is not required to establish reliance on an insured's misrepresentations when asserting a fraud defense to a claim for policy benefits

  3. Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 26   Cited 95,025 times   653 Legal Analyses
    Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37

  4. Rule 16 - Pretrial Conferences; Scheduling; Management

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 16   Cited 33,726 times   51 Legal Analyses
    Adopting the sanctions authorized by Rule 37(b)

  5. Section 1117 - Recovery for violation of rights

    15 U.S.C. § 1117   Cited 4,886 times   144 Legal Analyses
    Granting district courts significant discretion to award damages for a violation of § 1125