§Why CasetextPricing

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Ocwen Financial Corporation, Inc. et al

MOTION to Compel Answer to Interrogatory 2 of its Second Set of Interrogatories

7 Cited authorities

  1. Essex Builders Group, Inc. v. Amerisure Ins. Co.

    230 F.R.D. 682 (M.D. Fla. 2005)   Cited 63 times
    Finding that an assignee of an insurance claim's response to an interrogatory that the assignor had the information sought was deficient and ordering the assignee to "make an effort to interview those witnesses and obtain the requested information"

  2. Linde v. Arab Bank, PLC

    CV-04-2799 (NG)(VVP) (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 20, 2012)   Cited 17 times
    Finding contention interrogatories were timely where discovery had been ongoing and was nearing completion

  3. Donahay v. Palm Beach Tours & Transp., Inc.

    242 F.R.D. 685 (S.D. Fla. 2007)   Cited 16 times
    Holding that if a party does not have the records necessary to respond to an interrogatory, it must state as such in its response

  4. Hamilton v. Radioshack Corp.

    No. C 11-00888 LB (N.D. Cal. Jun. 18, 2012)   Cited 5 times
    Rejecting work-product objection to contention interrogatories because "the work product doctrine does not protect the facts of a particular claim."

  5. Rule 37 - Failure to Make Disclosures or to Cooperate in Discovery; Sanctions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 37   Cited 45,912 times   320 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a party may be barred from using a witness if it fails to disclose the witness

  6. Rule 33 - Interrogatories to Parties

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 33   Cited 10,897 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Adopting Rule 30(b)

  7. Section 1024.41 - Loss mitigation procedures

    12 C.F.R. § 1024.41   Cited 772 times   54 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing borrowers to seek damages for servicer misconduct in connection with borrowers' review for loss mitigation options under § 2605(f)