23 Cited authorities

Arizona v. Gant
556 U.S. 332 (2009) Cited 3,891 times 41 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Fourth Amendment does not permit officers to search every vehicle incident to arrest
Terry v. Ohio
392 U.S. 1 (1968) Cited 38,164 times 73 Legal Analyses
Holding that a police officer who has reasonable suspicion of criminal activity may conduct a brief investigative stop
Arizona v. Johnson
555 U.S. 323 (2009) Cited 2,005 times 17 Legal Analyses
Holding police may "detain an automobile and its occupants pending inquiry into a vehicular violation" without "addition[al] cause to believe any occupant ... is involved in criminal activity"
Katz v. United States
389 U.S. 347 (1967) Cited 12,462 times 74 Legal Analyses
Holding that failure to recognize a reasonable expectation of privacy in a telephone booth would "ignore the vital role that the public telephone has come to play in private communication"
Chimel v. California
395 U.S. 752 (1969) Cited 5,661 times 24 Legal Analyses
Holding that, absent a search warrant, there is "no . . . justification" for searching an area not within a suspect's immediate control during an arrest
United States v. Robinson
414 U.S. 218 (1973) Cited 3,360 times 24 Legal Analyses
Holding that law enforcement officers are authorized to conduct a full search of every lawful custodial arrestee
Sibron v. New York
392 U.S. 40 (1968) Cited 3,595 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding that appeal from conviction after service of sentence not moot if there may be collateral consequences
Knowles v. Iowa
525 U.S. 113 (1998) Cited 865 times 16 Legal Analyses
Holding that when an officer cited a driver for speeding, the need to find evidence did not justify a search of a car because the officer had already obtained all the evidence necessary to prosecute the offense and no more evidence would be found in the car
McDonald v. United States
335 U.S. 451 (1948) Cited 1,341 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that officers' actions of climbing through a window of a boarding house, standing on a chair in the hallway, and peering through the transom above the defendant's door constituted an unlawful search
People v. Johnson
66 N.Y.2d 398 (N.Y. 1985) Cited 374 times 1 Legal Analyses
Rejecting Gates test for warrantless searches under state constitution

The People, Respondent,v.Graham Reid, Appellant.

23 Cited authorities

Holding that the Fourth Amendment does not permit officers to search every vehicle incident to arrest

Holding that a police officer who has reasonable suspicion of criminal activity may conduct a brief investigative stop

Holding police may "detain an automobile and its occupants pending inquiry into a vehicular violation" without "addition[al] cause to believe any occupant ... is involved in criminal activity"

Holding that failure to recognize a reasonable expectation of privacy in a telephone booth would "ignore the vital role that the public telephone has come to play in private communication"

Holding that, absent a search warrant, there is "no . . . justification" for searching an area not within a suspect's immediate control during an arrest

Holding that law enforcement officers are authorized to conduct a full search of every lawful custodial arrestee

Holding that appeal from conviction after service of sentence not moot if there may be collateral consequences

Holding that when an officer cited a driver for speeding, the need to find evidence did not justify a search of a car because the officer had already obtained all the evidence necessary to prosecute the offense and no more evidence would be found in the car

Holding that officers' actions of climbing through a window of a boarding house, standing on a chair in the hallway, and peering through the transom above the defendant's door constituted an unlawful search

Rejecting Gates test for warrantless searches under state constitution