39 Cited authorities

Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (1984) Cited 158,880 times 176 Legal Analyses
Holding an "error by counsel" doesn't "warrant setting aside the judgment of a criminal proceeding" where in the context of the whole proceeding the identified error "had no effect on the judgment"
U.S. v. Gonzalez-Lopez
548 U.S. 140 (2006) Cited 2,101 times 13 Legal Analyses
Holding that a violation of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel of choice does not require showing prejudice
Tollett v. Henderson
411 U.S. 258 (1973) Cited 5,138 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that guilty plea foreclosed inquiry into discrimination in grand jury selection, even though defendant and his attorney were unaware of such discrimination before the defendant entered his guilty plea
Wheat v. United States
486 U.S. 153 (1988) Cited 2,375 times 10 Legal Analyses
Holding in multiple-representation cases, a district court must help protect criminal defendants against counsel’s conflict of interest
People v. Lopez
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 1195 (N.Y. 2006) Cited 3,892 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that an appeal waiver encompasses "any issue that does not involve a right of constitutional dimension going to "the very heart of the process," and ruling that a valid appeal waiver precludes review of claims that a sentence is harsh or excessive
Rivera v. Illinois
556 U.S. 148 (2009) Cited 549 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding alleged violations of state law are not cognizable in a federal habeas corpus proceeding
Blackledge v. Perry
417 U.S. 21 (1974) Cited 1,719 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that it violates the Due Process Clause for a prosecutor to increase charges in response to a defendant's exercise of his right to appeal
Fields v. Attorney General of Maryland
956 F.2d 1290 (4th Cir. 1992) Cited 1,421 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that, "[a]bsent clear and convincing evidence to the contrary, a defendant is bound by the representations he makes under oath during a plea colloquy"
U.S. v. Moussaoui
591 F.3d 263 (4th Cir. 2010) Cited 468 times
Holding a defendant’s guilty plea foreclosed his Faretta challenge
People v. Hansen
95 N.Y.2d 227 (N.Y. 2000) Cited 444 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that, by pleading guilty, the defendant had forfeited his right to challenge the prosecutor's submission of hearsay evidence to the grand jury

The People, Appellant,v.Anthony Griffin, Respondent.

39 Cited authorities

Holding an "error by counsel" doesn't "warrant setting aside the judgment of a criminal proceeding" where in the context of the whole proceeding the identified error "had no effect on the judgment"

Holding that a violation of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel of choice does not require showing prejudice

Holding that guilty plea foreclosed inquiry into discrimination in grand jury selection, even though defendant and his attorney were unaware of such discrimination before the defendant entered his guilty plea

Holding in multiple-representation cases, a district court must help protect criminal defendants against counsel’s conflict of interest

Holding that an appeal waiver encompasses "any issue that does not involve a right of constitutional dimension going to "the very heart of the process," and ruling that a valid appeal waiver precludes review of claims that a sentence is harsh or excessive

Holding alleged violations of state law are not cognizable in a federal habeas corpus proceeding

Holding that it violates the Due Process Clause for a prosecutor to increase charges in response to a defendant's exercise of his right to appeal

Holding that, "[a]bsent clear and convincing evidence to the contrary, a defendant is bound by the representations he makes under oath during a plea colloquy"

Holding a defendant’s guilty plea foreclosed his Faretta challenge

Holding that, by pleading guilty, the defendant had forfeited his right to challenge the prosecutor's submission of hearsay evidence to the grand jury