24 Cited authorities

  1. Liriano v. Hobart Corp.

    92 N.Y.2d 232 (N.Y. 1998)   Cited 411 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that no duty to warn exists when hazards are known through "general knowledge"
  2. Pulka v. Edelman

    40 N.Y.2d 781 (N.Y. 1976)   Cited 788 times
    Holding that parking garage owner had no special relationship to pedestrians passing by on sidewalk in front of garage exit and that garage had no duty to protect off-premise pedestrians from negligent conduct of patrons
  3. Hamilton v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.

    96 N.Y.2d 222 (N.Y. 2001)   Cited 304 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that handgun manufacturers do not owe a duty of reasonable care in the marketing and distribution of their handguns to persons injured or killed through the use of illegally obtained handguns, but leaving open the question of retailers' liability
  4. O'Neil v. Crane Co.

    53 Cal.4th 335 (Cal. 2012)   Cited 173 times   26 Legal Analyses
    Holding that product manufacturer is not liable under any theory for harm caused by a third party's products
  5. Codling v. Paglia

    32 N.Y.2d 330 (N.Y. 1973)   Cited 427 times
    Holding manufacturer liable for defective product "provided that" plaintiff could not by exercise of reasonable care have discovered the defect and perceived its danger or otherwise averted his injury
  6. Micallef v. Miehle Co.

    39 N.Y.2d 376 (N.Y. 1976)   Cited 359 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Rejecting obviousness of the danger as a complete bar to negligence claims but retaining it with respect to strict product liability claims
  7. Cover v. Cohen

    61 N.Y.2d 261 (N.Y. 1984)   Cited 270 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that liability in a design-defect case requires a balancing of “the product's risks against its utility and costs and against the risks, utility and cost of the alternatives”
  8. Rastelli v. Goodyear Tire Co.

    79 N.Y.2d 289 (N.Y. 1992)   Cited 210 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding there is no duty to warn about another manufacturer's product when defendant manufactured only sound products and had "no control over the production" of the defective products at issue in the case
  9. Hoover v. New Holland N. Am., Inc.

    2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 2215 (N.Y. 2014)   Cited 95 times
    Noting that "expert evidence raised a question whether failure to replace the [safety] shield [on a post hole digger] alone caused plaintiff's injuries, or whether [this] pointed to a failure on defendants' part in selling and distributing the digger with a defectively designed shield," insofar as the shield was not designed to last the life of the digger
  10. Braaten v. Saberhagen Holdings

    165 Wn. 2d 373 (Wash. 2008)   Cited 74 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "a manufacturer has no duty . . . to warn of the dangers of exposure to asbestos in products it did not manufacture and for which the manufacturer was not in the chain of distribution"