§Why CasetextPricing

Marie Bradley,, et al., Appellants,v.HWA 1290 III LLC, et al., Respondents.

Brief

33 Cited authorities

  1. Comes v. New York State Electric and Gas Corporation

    82 N.Y.2d 876 (N.Y. 1993)   Cited 1,756 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding no liability under common law or Labor Law § 200 in absence of evidence of supervision or control

  2. Lombardi v. Stout

    80 N.Y.2d 290 (N.Y. 1992)   Cited 944 times
    Finding that where plaintiff fell from a ladder while removing tree branches, the accident arose from the manner plaintiff conducted his work, and not from a dangerous condition

  3. Zalot v. Zieba

    81 A.D.3d 935 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)   Cited 158 times

    No. 2009-07781. February 22, 2011. In an action to recover damages for wrongful death, etc., the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hart, J.), entered July 27, 2009, as granted that branch of the defendants' motion, joined in by the third-party defendant Craftman Construction, Inc., which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The Perecman Firm, PLLC, New York, N.Y. (David H. Perecman and Peter D. Rigelhaupt of counsel)

  4. Roldan v. New York Univ

    81 A.D.3d 625 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)   Cited 90 times
    In Roldan v. New York Univ., 81 A.D.3d 625 (2d Dept. 2011), the Second Department reiterated the well-settled principle that "the right to contractual indemnification depends upon the specific language of the contract."

  5. Carty v. Authority

    32 A.D.3d 732 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)   Cited 94 times
    Finding allegations of § 241 violation were insufficient where the only evidence was plaintiff's own vague testimony that lighting was "poor" and the subject area was "dark"

  6. Holliday v. Hudson Armored Car

    301 A.D.2d 392 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)   Cited 91 times

    1889, 1889A January 14, 2003. Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Saralee Evans, J.), entered February 26, 2002 and March 11, 2002, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendant-appellant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiffs-respondents' cross motion for leave to amend the complaint to include a cause of action for wrongful death, unanimously modified, on the law, defendant-appellant's motion for summary judgment granted, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. The Clerk

  7. Stock v. Otis

    52 A.D.3d 816 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)   Cited 66 times

    No. 2007-07361. June 24, 2008. In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant ThyssenKrupp Elevator Company appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Pines, J.), dated June 25, 2007, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it. Babchik Young, White Plains, N.Y. (Zachary L. Berman and Daniel J. Quart of counsel), for appellant. Silberstein, Awad Miklos, P.C., Garden

  8. Sawyer v. Dreis & Krump Manufacturing Co.

    67 N.Y.2d 328 (N.Y. 1986)   Cited 116 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiff must prove that defendant's negligent failure to warn of the dangers of using its product or defendant's improper design caused plaintiff's injury

  9. Curran v. Esposito

    308 A.D.2d 428 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)   Cited 59 times

    2003-01094 Argued June 16, 2003. September 8, 2003. In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Lally, J.), dated January 14, 2003, which denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Congdon, Flaherty, O'Callaghan, Reid, Donlon, Travis Fishlinger, Garden City, N.Y. (Kathleen D. Foley of counsel), for appellant. Alan I. Boockvar, Mineola, N.Y., for respondent. Before: ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P., ROBERT

  10. Herman v. St. John's Episcopal

    242 A.D.2d 316 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)   Cited 60 times

    August 18, 1997 Appeal from Supreme Court, Nassau County (DeMaro, J.). Ordered that the order is modified by deleting the provision thereof which denied that branch of the motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff's cause of action pursuant to Labor Law § 241 (6) and substituting therefor a provision granting that branch of the motion to the extent of dismissing so much of the cause of action based upon an alleged violation of 12 NYCRR 23-1.30 and denying that branch of the motion

  11. Section 600.10 - Format and content of records, appendices and briefs

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 600.10   Cited 11 times

    (a) Form and size. (1) Generally; paper and page size. Records, appendices and briefs shall be reproduced by any method that produces a permanent, legible, black on white copy and shall be on a good grade of white, opaque, unglazed recycled paper that satisfies the requirements of subdivision (e) of this section. Paper shall measure vertically 11 inches on the bound edge and horizontally 81/2 inches. The clerk may refuse to accept for filing a paper which is not legible or otherwise does not comply