12 Cited authorities

  1. Matter of Balcerak v. the County of Nassau

    94 N.Y.2d 253 (N.Y. 1999)   Cited 59 times
    Holding that possession of New York driver's license was insufficient
  2. Auqui v. Seven Thirty One Ltd. P'ship

    985 N.E.2d 889 (N.Y. 2013)   Cited 11 times

    2013-02-14 Maria AUQUI, as Guardian of the Property of Jose Verdugo, et al., Respondents, v. SEVEN THIRTY ONE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP et al., Appellants. Mauro Lilling Naparty LLP, Woodbury (Matthew W. Naparty and Richard J. Montes, of counsel), for appellants. Law Offices of Annette G. Hasapidis, South Salem (Annette G. Hasapidis of counsel), and Schwartz, Goldstone & Campisi, LLP, New York City (Herbert Rodriguez, Jr., of counsel), for respondents. Mauro Lilling Naparty LLP, Woodbury (Matthew W. Naparty

  3. Matter of Evans v. Monaghan

    306 N.Y. 312 (N.Y. 1954)   Cited 113 times
    In Matter of Evans v. Monaghan (306 N.Y. 312, 319-320) we said that "we have not lost sight of the statement made by the dissenting justices at the Appellate Division: `While technically section 399 of the Code of Criminal Procedure may not be formally applicable, the basic reason for its salutary purpose should in fairness and justice be not lost sight of in police trials upon charges involving criminality.' (282 App. Div. 382, 396.)
  4. Matter of Guimarales

    503 N.E.2d 113 (N.Y. 1986)   Cited 39 times

    Argued October 10, 1986 Decided November 25, 1986 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department. Frederick A.O. Schwarz, Jr., Corporation Counsel (Lucy A. Cardwell and June A. Witterschein of counsel), for appellant. Respondent precluded. MEMORANDUM. The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, and the matter remitted to the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board for proceedings in accordance with this memorandum. After claimant was fired from the

  5. Crosby v. Workers' Comp

    442 N.E.2d 1191 (N.Y. 1982)   Cited 37 times
    Sustaining scheme requiring approval by the Workers' Compensation Board of a worker's attorneys' fees against state and federal constitutional challenges; federal equal protection challenge rejected on ground that statute "clearly promotes the over-all objective of ensuring adequate economic relief to the employee or his family"
  6. Engel v. Calgon Corp.

    114 A.D.2d 108 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)   Cited 27 times

    February 6, 1986 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department. Walter A. Engel, Jr., pro se, and James W. Cooper for Walter A. Engel, Jr., petitioner. Epstein, Becker, Borsody Green (William A. Carmell of counsel), for respondent. MAHONEY, P.J. In April 1984, petitioner, age 51, filed a complaint with the State Division of Human Rights (Division), charging that he had been unlawfully discriminated against by Calgon Corporation on the basis of his age. Petitioner

  7. Claim of Keeley v. Jamestown City School

    295 A.D.2d 876 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)   Cited 9 times

    91458 Decided and Entered: June 27, 2002. Appeal from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed June 4, 2001, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant did not sustain a causally related disability and denied his claim for workers' compensation benefits. Fessenden, Laumer De Angelo, Jamestown (Daniel T. Gullotti of counsel), for appellant. Hamberger Weiss, Buffalo (David F. Davis of counsel), for Jamestown City School District and another, respondents. Before: Crew III, J.P., Carpinello,

  8. Matter of Mitchell v. N.Y. City T. Auth

    244 A.D.2d 723 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)   Cited 9 times

    November 20, 1997 Appeal from the Workers' Compensation Board. Claimant worked as a bus driver for the employer from 1971 until 1993. On April 19, 1991, apparently without a precipitating incident, claimant suddenly experienced severe lower back pain radiating into his left lower extremity. This condition ultimately required surgery in May 1991 for a herniated lumbar disk. Claimant subsequently filed for workers' compensation benefits, alleging that his disability was caused by over 20 years of operating

  9. Brugman v. City of New York

    64 N.Y.2d 1011 (N.Y. 1985)   Cited 18 times

    Argued February 11, 1985 Decided March 28, 1985 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, David H. Edwards, Jr., J. Herbert Stutman for appellants. Lester E. Fetell for New York City Housing Authority, respondent. MEMORANDUM. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. We need not decide whether the proceedings before the Medical Board warrant a departure from the general rule of issue preclusion. The plaintiff had a full and

  10. Matter of Engel v. Calgon Corporation

    69 N.Y.2d 753 (N.Y. 1987)   Cited 15 times

    Submitted January 9, 1987 Decided February 10, 1987 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department. James W. Cooper for appellant. William A. Carmell, Richard J. Reibstein and Joy D. Oberman for Calgon Corporation, respondent. Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Presiding Justice A. Franklin Mahoney at the Appellate Division ( 114 A.D.2d 108; see also, Matter of Guimarales [New York City Bd. of Educ. — Roberts], 68 N.Y.2d