Schwartz v. Public Administrator
24 N.Y.2d 65 (N.Y. 1969) Cited 933 timesFinding that mutuality is not required for collateral estoppel, as long as the party against whom the doctrine is invoked has had a full opportunity to litigate the issue
Gilberg v. Barbieri
53 N.Y.2d 285 (N.Y. 1981) Cited 430 timesConcluding conviction for petty offense of harassment did not preclude defendant from contesting merits of subsequent civil suit for assault where defendant did not have incentive to litigate thoroughly in prior action given the "minor" significance of the petty violation, the lack of a right to a jury trial, the lack of vigor typical of the defense of such violations, and the lack of any indication that the parties anticipated the determination would be used against defendant in later litigation
B.R. DeWitt, Inc. v. Hall
19 N.Y.2d 141 (N.Y. 1967) Cited 205 timesHolding that res judicata does not require mutuality
People v. Plevy
52 N.Y.2d 58 (N.Y. 1980) Cited 120 times 1 Legal AnalysesIn People v Plevy (52 N.Y.2d, at 65) we recognized that defendant's testimony at a suppression hearing is important proof that may well alter the result, especially when police testimony is not otherwise contradicted.
Hinchey v. Sellers
7 N.Y.2d 287 (N.Y. 1959) Cited 118 timesFinding privity “by virtue of the indemnitor-indemnitee relationship existing between an insurer and an insured”
Casas v. Consol. Edison Co. of N.Y., Inc.
105 A.D.3d 471 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013) Cited 4 times2013-04-9 Luis CASAS, etc., Plaintiff–Respondent, v. CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC., Defendant–Appellant. Armienti, DeBellis, Guglielmo & Rhoden, LLP, New York (Vanessa M. Corchia of counsel), for appellant. Annette G. Hasapidis, Mt. Kisco, for respondent. MAZZARELLI Armienti, DeBellis, Guglielmo & Rhoden, LLP, New York (Vanessa M. Corchia of counsel), for appellant. Annette G. Hasapidis, Mt. Kisco, for respondent. MAZZARELLI, J.P., ACOSTA, RENWICK, RICHTER, GISCHE, JJ. Order, Supreme
Engel v. Calgon Corp.
114 A.D.2d 108 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986) Cited 27 timesFebruary 6, 1986 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department. Walter A. Engel, Jr., pro se, and James W. Cooper for Walter A. Engel, Jr., petitioner. Epstein, Becker, Borsody Green (William A. Carmell of counsel), for respondent. MAHONEY, P.J. In April 1984, petitioner, age 51, filed a complaint with the State Division of Human Rights (Division), charging that he had been unlawfully discriminated against by Calgon Corporation on the basis of his age. Petitioner
Commissioners of State Ins. Fund v. Low
3 N.Y.2d 590 (N.Y. 1958) Cited 73 timesArgued November 19, 1957 Decided January 23, 1958 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, KENNETH S. MacAFFER, J. John E. Knauf and William J. Murphy for appellant. Raymond C. Green, Charles G. Tierney, William H. Stieglitz and Harry Schechter for respondents. DESMOND, J. Appellate Division, Third Department, granted defendant leave to appeal from a nonfinal order denying defendant's motion for summary judgment and certified a question as to whether
Brugman v. City of New York
102 A.D.2d 413 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984) Cited 12 timesJune 28, 1984 Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County, David H. Edwards, Jr., J. Herbert Stutman of counsel ( Barton Zasky, attorneys), for appellants. Lester E. Fetell of counsel ( Peter I. Hoppenfeld with him on the brief; Fetell Coen, P.C., attorneys), for New York City Housing Authority, respondent. FEIN, J. Plaintiff Dennis Brugman, a sanitation man for the City of New York, sues to recover damages for injuries allegedly sustained on August 30, 1979. He claims that in the course of his
Section 501 - Exemption from tax on corporations, certain trusts, etc
26 U.S.C. § 501 Cited 3,223 times 290 Legal AnalysesGranting tax-exempt status to qualified pension plans