§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of the Claim of Lidia Burgos, Appellant,v.Citywide Central Insurance Program et al., Respondents, Workers' Compensation Board, Respondent.

Brief

2 Cited authorities

  1. Burgos v. Citywide Cent. Ins. Program

    148 A.D.3d 1493 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)   Cited 18 times

    523075 03-30-2017 In the Matter of the Claim of LIDIA BURGOS, Appellant, v. CITYWIDE CENTRAL INSURANCE PROGRAM et al., Respondents. WORKERS' COMPENSATION BOARD, Respondent. Law Office of Michael D. Uysal, PLLC, New York City (Michael D. Uysal of counsel), for appellant. Weiss, Wexler & Wornow, PC, New York City (J. Evan Perigoe of counsel), for Citywide Central Insurance Program and another, respondents. McCarthy, J.P. Before: , Garry, Lynch, Devine and Mulvey, JJ. Law Office of Michael D. Uysal

  2. Vandermark v. Frontier Ins. Co.

    60 A.D.3d 1171 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)   Cited 16 times

    No. 505020. March 12, 2009. Appeals (1) from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed September 21, 2007, which ruled that claimant has a permanent total disability, and (2) from a decision of said Board, filed July 16, 2008, which denied the applications of the employer and its workers' compensation carrier for reconsideration and/or full Board review. Walsh Hacker, Albany (Lauren A. Ryba of counsel), for appellants. Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, New York City (Iris A. Steel of