§Why CasetextPricing

Niurka Andino, Respondent-Appellant,v.Ronald Mills, et al., Appellants-Respondents. (And a Third-Party Action.)

Brief

19 Cited authorities

  1. Matter of Lichtenstein v. Board of Trustees

    57 N.Y.2d 1010 (N.Y. 1982)   Cited 257 times
    In Lichtenstein v. Bd. of Trustees of the Police Pension Fund, 57 N.Y.2d 1010, 1012, 457 N.Y.S.2d 472, 443 N.E.2d 946 (1982), the Court of Appeals of New York noted that the term "accident" is not specifically defined in the Code.

  2. Inchaustegui v. 666 5th Avenue Ltd. Partnership

    96 N.Y.2d 111 (N.Y. 2001)   Cited 146 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that because failure to procure insurance is a contract claim, damages are limited to the economic injury caused by the breach of contract

  3. Oden v. Chemung County Industrial Development Agency

    87 N.Y.2d 81 (N.Y. 1995)   Cited 124 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, to apply an offset pursuant to section 4545, a correspondence must be shown between the collateral source payment and the item of pecuniary loss to be replaced

  4. Fisher v. Qualico Contr. Corp.

    98 N.Y.2d 534 (N.Y. 2002)   Cited 75 times
    Finding that "replacement cost and diminution in market value measured the same loss"

  5. Bryant v. New York City Health & Hosps. Corp.

    93 N.Y.2d 592 (N.Y. 1999)   Cited 80 times
    Holding that the proper basis for determining the amount of annual payments is the future, not present, value of a future damages award; reducing a future damages award to its present value, and requiring payment of that discounted award in future installments does not assure that the plaintiff will recover the full amount of future damages.

  6. Gonzalez v. Iocovello

    93 N.Y.2d 539 (N.Y. 1999)   Cited 76 times
    Holding that Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1104(e) could serve as a predicate for liability because it did not absolve operators of emergency vehicles of liability for “reckless disregard for the safety of others”

  7. Bitchatchi v. Bd. of Trs. of the N.Y.C. Police Dep't Pension Fund

    2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 8566 (N.Y. 2012)   Cited 41 times
    In Bitchatchi, approximately one year after WTC exposure, the petitioner discovered a cyst near her rectum, and a biopsy revealed that she had rectal cancer.

  8. Terranova v. Transit

    49 A.D.3d 10 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)   Cited 46 times
    In Terranova, the defendant's negligence consisted of permitting grease to build up on a pump room floor (49 AD3d at 18).

  9. Firefighters Assn v. Beekman

    52 N.Y.2d 463 (N.Y. 1981)   Cited 87 times
    In Beekman, we concluded that General Municipal Law § 207-k established a presumption that heart impairment was accidentally sustained, although the statute itself did not expressly so provide.

  10. Stolowski v. 234 East 178th Street LLC

    89 A.D.3d 549 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)   Cited 17 times

    2011-11-15 Eugene STOLOWSKI, et al., Plaintiffs,Eileen Bellew, etc., et al., Plaintiffs–Respondents, v. 234 EAST 178TH STREET LLC, Defendant–Appellant,The City of New York, Defendant.Eugene Stolowski, et al., Plaintiffs–Respondents, v. 234 East 178th Street, LLC, Defendant–Appellant,The City of New York, Defendant.[And Other Actions]. Lester Schwab Katz & Dwyer, LLP, New York (John Sandercock of counsel), for appellant. Sullivan Papain Block McGrath & Cannavo P.C., New York (Stephen C. Glasser of

  11. Section 500.13 - Content and form of briefs in normal course appeals

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 500.13

    (a) Content. All briefs shall conform to the requirements of section 500.1 of this Part and contain a table of contents, a table of cases and authorities, questions presented, point headings, and, if necessary, a disclosure statement pursuant to section 500.1(f) of this Part. Such disclosure statement shall be included before the table of contents in the party's principal brief. Appellant's brief shall include a statement showing that the court has jurisdiction to entertain the appeal and to review