§Why CasetextPricing

The People, Respondent,v.Mary Anne Grady Flores, Appellant.

Brief

42 Cited authorities

  1. Perry Ed. Assn. v. Perry Local Educators' Assn

    460 U.S. 37 (1983)   Cited 2,244 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that content-neutral time, place, and manner restrictions on speech must be "narrowly tailored to serve a significant government interest, and leave open ample alternative channels of communication"

  2. People v. Bleakley

    69 N.Y.2d 490 (N.Y. 1987)   Cited 11,303 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Appellate Division committed reversible error when it "avoid[ed] its exclusive statutory authority to review the weight of the evidence in criminal cases"

  3. Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition

    535 U.S. 234 (2002)   Cited 944 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding invalid the challenged provision of the CPPA because it “cover[ed] materials beyond the categories recognized in Ferber and Miller”

  4. McCullen v. Coakley

    573 U.S. 464 (2014)   Cited 525 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding unconstitutional buffer zone restriction requiring plaintiffs to stand a substantial distance away from an abortion provider's driveway

  5. Johnson v. Zerbst

    304 U.S. 458 (1938)   Cited 8,802 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a waiver of constitutional rights must be knowing and intelligent

  6. Nebraska Press Assn. v. Stuart

    427 U.S. 539 (1976)   Cited 1,428 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the record [was] lacking in evidence to support" a finding that alternative "measures might not be adequate"

  7. Madsen v. Women's Health Center, Inc.

    512 U.S. 753 (1994)   Cited 636 times
    Holding that an injunction against anti-abortion protesters was not viewpoint discriminatory because "none of the restrictions imposed by the court were directed at the contents of petitioner's message."

  8. Police Department of Chicago v. Mosley

    408 U.S. 92 (1972)   Cited 1,333 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding a law was content-based where it prohibited nonlabor-related picketing at a place of employment

  9. International Soc. for Krishna Consciousness v. Lee

    505 U.S. 672 (1992)   Cited 596 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that speech restrictions in nonpublic fora must be viewpoint-neutral

  10. Erznoznik v. City of Jacksonville

    422 U.S. 205 (1975)   Cited 778 times
    Holding unconstitutional ordinance making it unlawful for drive-in theater to exhibit films showing nudity