Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. Sanders
437 U.S. 340 (1978) Cited 4,385 times 20 Legal AnalysesHolding that that the production of putative class members' names pursuant to Federal Rule 26 was not "within the scope of legitimate discovery."
Wilson v. International Business Machines Corp.
62 F.3d 237 (8th Cir. 1995) Cited 296 timesHolding that to survive a motion for summary judgment, the nonmoving party must "substantiate his allegations with sufficient probative evidence would permit a finding in [his] favor based on more than mere speculation, conjecture, or fantasy"
Jones v. Lehigh Southwest Cement Co., Inc.
Case No.: 1:12-cv-00633 - AWI - JLT (E.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2014) Cited 13 timesCase No.: 1:12-cv-00633 - AWI - JLT 01-30-2014 WILLIAM RAY JONES, SR., Plaintiff, v. LEHIGH SOUTHWEST CEMENT COMPANY, INC., Defendant. Jennifer L. Thurston ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND TO COMPEL DEFENDANT TO COMPLETE DEPOSITIONS (Docs. 76, 79) ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS (Doc. 77) Plaintiff William Jones seeks to compel Lehigh Southwest Cement Company, Inc. ("Lehigh" or "Defendant") to respond to his requests for discovery and
Hyland v. HomeServices of Am., Inc.
CASE NO. 3:05-CV-612 (W.D. Ky. May. 14, 2012) Cited 13 timesHolding that plaintiffs' motion to compel was untimely and noting that plaintiffs failed to articulate any justification for their failure to do so until six months after the defendants' responses were served and ten days before the close of discovery
Davidson v. Apple, Inc.
Case No.16-cv-04942-LHK (VKD) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 26, 2018) Cited 1 timesDenying in part motion to compel filed "very late in the discovery period" to the extent the plaintiffs already "compromised" regarding that discovery in a previously resolved discovery dispute but granting in part as to other requested discovery
Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery
Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 Cited 94,817 times 651 Legal AnalysesAdopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37