§Why CasetextPricing

James v. Intelligent Software Solutions, Inc.

MOTION to Compel Plaintiff to Complete Deposition and For Other Relief

2 Cited authorities

  1. Limu Co. v. Burling

    Case No: 6:12-cv-347-Orl-TBS (M.D. Fla. Apr. 10, 2013)   Cited 12 times

    Case No: 6:12-cv-347-Orl-TBS 04-10-2013 LIMU COMPANY, LLC, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW BURLING and NANCY BURLING, Defendants. THOMAS B. SMITH ORDER Pending before the Court is Plaintiff, Limu Company, LLC's, Motion to Compel Discovery Responses and Depositions from Defendants, Andrew and Nancy Burling. (Doc. 28). Defendants have not filed a response in opposition, and the time to do so has expired. For the following reasons, the motion is due to be granted. I. Background Plaintiff has sued Defendants for

  2. Rule 30 - Depositions by Oral Examination

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 30   Cited 16,033 times   126 Legal Analyses
    Upholding a district court's decision not to consider the plaintiff's deposition errata sheets in opposition to a motion for summary judgment when they were untimely