§Why CasetextPricing

Power Analytics Corporation v. Operation Technology, Inc. et al

REPLY NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Attorney Fees 405 ETAP's Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to Motion for Attorney Fees

7 Cited authorities

  1. Hensley v. Eckerhart

    461 U.S. 424 (1983)   Cited 21,888 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding a civil-rights plaintiff can recover attorney's fees for claims that "involve a common core of facts or will be based on related legal theories," even if only one of those claims arises under a fee-shifting statute

  2. Octane Fitness, LLC v. Icon Health & Fitness, Inc.

    572 U.S. 545 (2014)   Cited 1,433 times   122 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an "exceptional" case under § 285 is "one that stands out from others with respect to the substantive strength of a party's litigating position ... or the unreasonable manner in which the case was litigated"

  3. Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 26   Cited 97,825 times   674 Legal Analyses
    Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37

  4. Rule 1 - Scope and Purpose

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 1   Cited 15,441 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the federal rules of civil procedure should be employed to promote the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding"

  5. Rule 33 - Interrogatories to Parties

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 33   Cited 11,139 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Adopting Rule 30(b)

  6. Rule 802 - The Rule Against Hearsay

    Fed. R. Evid. 802   Cited 3,925 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing federal statutes, the Federal Rules of Evidence, or Supreme Court rules as sources for exceptions to the rule against hearsay

  7. Rule 602 - Need for Personal Knowledge

    Fed. R. Evid. 602   Cited 3,576 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Stating that " witness may testify only if evidence is introduced sufficient to support a finding that the witness has personal knowledge of the matter"