12 Cited authorities

  1. TY, Inc. v. Jones Group, Inc.

    237 F.3d 891 (7th Cir. 2001)   Cited 571 times
    Holding that similarities between the defendant's "Beanie Racers" and Ty, Inc.'s "Beanie Babies" could cause the public to believe that the defendant's products were affiliated or associated with Ty, Inc.
  2. Roland Machinery Co. v. Dresser Industries

    749 F.2d 380 (7th Cir. 1984)   Cited 882 times
    Holding that a damages remedy can be inadequate if plaintiff becomes insolvent or loses its business; plaintiff is unable to finance the lawsuit; or plaintiff incurs damages that are very difficult to calculate; or defendant becomes insolvent or loses its business
  3. Tucker Anthony Realty Corp. v. Schlesinger

    888 F.2d 969 (2d Cir. 1989)   Cited 415 times
    Finding irreparable harm where “there is ample evidence of plaintiffs' imminent bankruptcy, absent the issuance of a preliminary injunction” in light of various liabilities including loans “due on demand,” including some to individuals “who could demand payment at any time and ... bring down the whole house of cards”
  4. In re World Trade Center Disaster

    503 F.3d 167 (2d Cir. 2007)   Cited 153 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding that harm to defendants, who might be entitled to immunity from suit, was outweighed by hastening plaintiffs’ trial
  5. United Steelworkers of America v. Textron, Inc.

    836 F.2d 6 (1st Cir. 1987)   Cited 88 times
    Holding that injunction requiring the defendant to pay insurance premiums was prohibitory in nature because the "last uncontested status ... was a status in which [the defendant] paid the necessary premiums"
  6. Woodruff v. McPhie

    383 F. App'x 5 (D.C. Cir. 2010)   Cited 9 times

    No. 09-5086. June 25, 2010. Rehearing En Banc Denied July 28, 2010. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:06-cv-00688-RBW). Phillip S. Woodruff, Upper Marlboro, MD, pro se. Madelyn Elise Johnson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, R. Craig Lawrence, Ronald C. Machen, Jr., Esquire, U.S., U.S. Attorney's Office, Washington, DC, for Appellee. Before: HENDERSON, TATEL, and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges. JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This case was considered on the record from the United

  7. Woodruff v. McPhie

    593 F. Supp. 2d 272 (D.D.C. 2009)   Cited 7 times

    Civil Action No. 06-0688 (RBW). January 23, 2009. Phillip S. Woodruff, Upper Marlboro, MD, pro se. Madelyn E. Johnson, U.S. Attorney's Office for D.C., Washington, DC, for Defendant. Memorandum Opinion REGGIE B. WALTON, District Judge Phillip S. Woodruff ("the plaintiff") brought this pro se lawsuit against the Chairman ("the defendant") of the United States Merit Systems Protection Board's (the "Board") Office of Equal Employment Opportunity ("EEO Office") claiming that the EEO Office improperly

  8. Vargas-Figueroa v. Saldana

    826 F.2d 160 (1st Cir. 1987)   Cited 23 times

    No. 86-2014. Submitted June 5, 1987. Decided August 18, 1987. Ruben T. Nigaglioni, James D. Noel, III, Ledesma, Palou Miranda, Hato Rey, P.R., and Lady Alfonso de Cumpiano, Legal Counsel, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, P.R., on brief, for defendants, appellants. Eliezer Aldarondo Ortiz, Hato Rey, P.R., Miguel Pagan, San Juan, P.R., and Aldarondo Lopez Bras, Hato Rey, P.R., on brief, for plaintiff, appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico. Before

  9. D.C. Federation, Civic Associations v. Volpe

    520 F.2d 451 (D.C. Cir. 1975)   Cited 34 times
    Granting relief under Rule 60(b) where the district court's order “was inconsistent with an intervening decision of [the D.C. Circuit]”
  10. Rule 60 - Relief from a Judgment or Order

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 60   Cited 53,669 times   147 Legal Analyses
    Granting relief from the operation of a judgment
  11. Rule 6 - Computing and Extending Time; Time for Motion Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 6   Cited 48,543 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "if the last day [of a period] is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the period continues to run until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday."
  12. Rule 62 - Stay of Proceedings to Enforce a Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 62   Cited 4,133 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Granting of stay is discretionary