Case No.: 3:09-cv-311-J-25 MCR (M.D. Fla. May. 27, 2010) Cited 8 times 2 Legal Analyses
Finding that the defendant was entitled to the bona fide error defense as a matter of law for violating the FDCPA by communicating to a third party, because the third party was the plaintiff's father, it was undisputed that the plaintiff had been living with her father for about 12 months in the past two to three years, and a Lexis Nexis Accurint search produced the plaintiff's father's telephone number