9 Cited authorities

Raritan Development Corp. v. Silva
91 N.Y.2d 98 (N.Y. 1997) Cited 190 times
In Raritan, the question was whether "floor area" excludes "cellar space" (91 N.Y.2d at 100–101, 667 N.Y.S.2d 327, 689 N.E.2d 1373).
Laurie Marie M v. Jeffrey T M
159 A.D.2d 52 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990) Cited 93 times 2 Legal Analyses
Finding from prior proceeding that defendant was guilty of sexual abuse in the second degree pursuant to Penal Law § 130.60 was proper basis for granting plaintiff judgment as a matter of law on her battery cause of action
Matter of Nicholas v. Kahn
47 N.Y.2d 24 (N.Y. 1979) Cited 122 times
In Nicholas the Public Service Commission adopted rules prohibiting various employees, and their children and spouses, from owning any interest in certain business concerns whose performance was related to companies regulated by the Commission.
Matter of Williams v. City of New York
64 N.Y.2d 800 (N.Y. 1985) Cited 60 times
In Williams, the court held that a determination by the Corporation Counsel of the City of New York that a New York City correction officer acted outside the scope of employment when he committed acts for which he was later sued was controlling on the duty to defend, subject only to an arbitrary and capricious standard of review.
Yong-Myun Rho v. Ambach
74 N.Y.2d 318 (N.Y. 1989) Cited 36 times
In Matter of Rho v. Ambach (74 N.Y.2d 318), the Court of Appeals observed: Moreover, section 6509 (2) distinguishes between professional misconduct resulting from practicing with gross negligence on a "particular occasion" and practicing with ordinary negligence "on more than one occasion".
Sagal-Cotler v. Bd. of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of N.Y.
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 2775 (N.Y. 2013) Cited 8 times
Nos. 73 74. 2013-04-25 In the Matter of Deborah SAGAL–COTLER, Appellant, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF The CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT OF the CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents. In the Matter of Josephine Thomas, Appellant, v. New York City Department of Education et al., Respondents. Office of General Counsel, New York State United Teachers, New York City (Ariana A. Gambella and Richard E. Casagrande of counsel), for appellant in the first above-entitled action. Lichten & Bright, PC, New York City (Stuart
164th Bronx Park. v. City of New York
20 Misc. 3d 796 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2008) Cited 11 times
No. 14232/2007. January 17, 2008. Dreier LLP, New York City ( Don Abraham and Joseph P. Cervini Jr. of counsel), for petitioner. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York City ( Desiree Wise of counsel), for respondents. OPINION OF THE COURT LUCY BILLINGS, J. I. Background Petitioner operates a parking garage at 283 East 164th Street, Bronx County, near the Bronx County courthouses. Upon commencing this proceeding, petitioner sought to enjoin respondents' enforcement of an order padlocking
Joseph v. City of Buffalo
83 N.Y.2d 141 (N.Y. 1994) Cited 19 times
Argued January 13, 1994 Decided February 17, 1994 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, Irving Fudeman, J. Miserendino, Krull Foley, P.C., Buffalo (Philip Celniker, Michael R. Drumm and Joseph G. Krenitsky of counsel), for appellant. Napier, Fitzgerald Kirby, Buffalo (Kenneth R. Kirby of counsel), for City of Buffalo, respondent. Magavern Magavern, Buffalo (George R. Rich of counsel), for Randie Joseph, respondent. SMITH, J. The primary issue in
Matter of Timber Point v. Cty. of Suffolk
155 A.D.2d 671 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989) Cited 7 times
November 27, 1989 Ordered that that branch of the petition which challenges the constitutionality of Suffolk County Sanitary Code former § 607 (1) (renum § 609) is converted into an action for a declaratory judgment, with that branch of the petition deemed a complaint; and it is further, Adjudged that it is declared that Suffolk County Sanitary Code former § 607 (1) (renum § 609) is unconstitutional, the determinations are annulled, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted

In the Matter of Nicholas Lemma, Appellant,v.Nassau County Police Officer Indemnification Board, et al., Respondents.

9 Cited authorities

In Raritan, the question was whether "floor area" excludes "cellar space" (91 N.Y.2d at 100–101, 667 N.Y.S.2d 327, 689 N.E.2d 1373).

Finding from prior proceeding that defendant was guilty of sexual abuse in the second degree pursuant to Penal Law § 130.60 was proper basis for granting plaintiff judgment as a matter of law on her battery cause of action

In Nicholas the Public Service Commission adopted rules prohibiting various employees, and their children and spouses, from owning any interest in certain business concerns whose performance was related to companies regulated by the Commission.

In Matter of Rho v. Ambach (74 N.Y.2d 318), the Court of Appeals observed: Moreover, section 6509 (2) distinguishes between professional misconduct resulting from practicing with gross negligence on a "particular occasion" and practicing with ordinary negligence "on more than one occasion".