§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of Ryszard Grajko, Appellant,v.City of New York, et al., Respondents.

Brief

3 Cited authorities

  1. Newcomb v. Middle Country Cent. Sch. Dist.

    2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 8581 (N.Y. 2016)   Cited 326 times
    In Newcomb, the Court of Appeals endorsed a new rule establishing a shifting burden of proof in demonstrating that a late notice of claim substantially prejudices a public corporation (see 28 N.Y.3d at 467, 45 N.Y.S.3d 895, 68 N.E.3d 714).

  2. Grajko v. City of N.Y.

    150 A.D.3d 595 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)   Cited 12 times

    3535N 24793/16 05-25-2017 In re Ryszard Grajko, Petitioner-Respondent, v. The City of New York, et al., Respondents-Appellants. Cornell Grace, P.C., New York (Porsha R. Johnson of counsel), for appellants. Gregory J. Cannata & Associates, LLP, New York (Gregory J. Cannata of counsel), for respondent. Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Renwick, Andrias, Manzanet-Daniels, JJ. Cornell Grace, P.C., New York (Porsha R. Johnson of counsel), for appellants. Gregory J. Cannata & Associates, LLP, New York (Gregory J

  3. Section 500.11 - Alternative procedure for selected appeals

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 500.11   Cited 539 times

    (a) On its own motion, the court may review selected appeals by an alternative procedure. Such appeals shall be determined on the intermediate appellate court record or appendix and briefs, the writings in the courts below and additional letter submissions on the merits. The clerk of the court shall notify all parties by letter when an appeal has been selected for review pursuant to this section. Appellant may request such review in its preliminary appeal statement. Respondent may request such review