§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of David Kaslow, Respondent,v.City of New York, et al., Appellants.

Brief

13 Cited authorities

  1. Kurcsics v. Merchants Mut

    49 N.Y.2d 451 (N.Y. 1980)   Cited 618 times
    In Kurcsics, the court construed the phrase "first party benefits", contained in section 671 of the Insurance Law, as it related to no-fault insurance protection.

  2. Matter of Howard v. Wyman

    28 N.Y.2d 434 (N.Y. 1971)   Cited 822 times
    Holding that the "interpretation given a statute by the administering agency 'if not irrational or unreasonable, should be upheld'"

  3. Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n v. City of New York

    41 N.Y.2d 205 (N.Y. 1976)   Cited 408 times

    Argued October 12, 1976 Decided December 22, 1976 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, GEORGE STARKE, J. W. Bernard Richland, Corporation Counsel (James G. Greilsheimer and L. Kevin Sheridan of counsel), New York City, for appellant. Frederick R. Livingston, Jay W. Waks and William C. Zifchak, New York City, for respondent. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (George D. Zuckerman and Samuel A. Hirshowitz of counsel), New York City, for intervenor

  4. Doctors Council v. Nycers

    71 N.Y.2d 669 (N.Y. 1988)   Cited 149 times
    Noting the statutory protection afforded by Adm. Code §§ 13-104 and 13-101 to all persons in City-service, designed to exclude persons such as independent contractors, remains as important and relevant as when the statute was passed

  5. In the Matter of Orens v. Novello

    99 N.Y.2d 180 (N.Y. 2002)   Cited 79 times
    Relying on Merriam–Webster's Collegiate Dictionary and Black's Law Dictionary in determining meaning of term “lay member”

  6. Auerbach v. Board of Educ

    86 N.Y.2d 198 (N.Y. 1995)   Cited 54 times

    Argued June 6, 1995 Decided June 29, 1995 Appeal from the Board of Education of the City of School District of the City of New York. Paul A. Crotty, Corporation Counsel of New York City (John Hogrogian and Pamela Seider Dolgow of counsel), for appellants in the first, second and third above-entitled proceedings. Bruce K. Bryant, Brooklyn, for respondents in the first and second above-entitled proceedings. Pryor, Cashman, Sherman Flynn, New York City (Ronald H. Shechtman and Tina C. Kremenezky of

  7. Ballentine v. Koch

    89 N.Y.2d 51 (N.Y. 1996)   Cited 24 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Police Benevolent Association, which had agreed to recommend to the state legislature a bill creating a separate benefit fund, was bound by version of law negotiated and passed during legislative process. The Court also held that PBA officers were "acting outside the scope of its representational authority in agreeing to the statutory provisions at issue . . . [P]laintiffs designated the PBA as their agent for the collective bargaining negotiations at issue here and were thus bound by its actions taken on their behalf during the negotiation process . . ."

  8. In the Matter of McGarrigle v. City of N.Y

    23 A.D.3d 196 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)   Cited 6 times

    6694. November 3, 2005. Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Rosalyn Richter, J.), entered June 25, 2004, after a hearing, annulling respondents' calculation of McGarrigle's pension, and directing respondents to recalculate the pension, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Susan Paulson of counsel), for appellants. Koehler Isaacs LLP, New York (Mercedes Maldonado of counsel), for respondents. Before: Tom, J.P., Marlow,

  9. Kranker v. Levitt

    30 N.Y.2d 574 (N.Y. 1972)   Cited 45 times
    Holding unconstitutional the application to prior retirement system members a statute eliminating inclusion in final average salary of cash payments for accumulated vacation credits

  10. Deblasio v. City of New York

    24 Misc. 3d 789 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2009)   Cited 2 times

    No. 113654/03. April 13, 2009. Koehler Isaacs, LLP, New York City ( Mercedes M. Maldonado of counsel), for petitioners. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York City ( Keith M. Snow of counsel), for respondents. OPINION OF THE COURT MICHAEL D. STALLMAN, J. Motions bearing sequence Nos. 007 and 008 are consolidated for disposition. In motion sequence No. 007, petitioner the Correction Officers' Benevolent Association (COBA) moves, pursuant to CPLR 901, for an order certifying itself as the