10 Cited authorities

  1. Weinstock v. Columbia University

    224 F.3d 33 (2d Cir. 2000)   Cited 2,082 times
    Holding that "unsupported allegations do not create a material issue of fact"
  2. Berry v. Marchinkowski

    137 F. Supp. 3d 495 (S.D.N.Y. 2015)   Cited 92 times
    Holding that if probable cause existed at the time of arrest, "it continues to exist at the time of prosecution unless undermined by the discovery of some intervening fact"
  3. Alzawahra v. Albany Med. Ctr.

    546 F. App'x 53 (2d Cir. 2013)   Cited 24 times
    Declining to rule on discovery disputes raised for the first time in opposition to summary judgment motion
  4. Novak v. Waterfront Comm'n of N.Y. Harbor

    928 F. Supp. 2d 723 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)   Cited 17 times
    In Novak, there was no evidence that the defendant supervisor had made any sexual advances towards the plaintiff after their breakup, and therefore plaintiff did not have an actionable Title VII claim.
  5. Continental Insurance Co. v. Atlantic Casualty Ins. Co.

    07 Civ. 3635 (DC) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 4, 2009)   Cited 9 times

    07 Civ. 3635 (DC). June 4, 2009 COZEN O'CONNOR, Attorneys for Plaintiff, By: Erick J. Kirker, Esq., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. NIXON PEABODY LLP, Attorneys for Defendant, By: Aidan M. McCormack, Esq., Erik W. Drewniak, Esq., New York, New York. MEMORANDUM DECISION DENNY CHIN, District Judge This case arises out of a June 1, 2004 fire that severely damaged the Pelham Manor, New York home of Donald and Cecile Swallow (the "Swallows"). The fire was caused by the alleged negligence of Wodraska Brothers

  6. Borrelli v. Orange Reg'l Med. Ctr.

    18 CV 270 (VB) (S.D.N.Y. May. 23, 2018)

    18 CV 270 (VB) 05-23-2018 ALBA BORRELLI, Plaintiff, v. ORANGE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, LAUREN CARBERRY, and ROBIN BRENNAN-SEIBEL, Defendants. Briccetti, J. OPINION AND ORDER : Plaintiff Alba Borrelli brings this action alleging defendants Orange Regional Medical Center ("ORMC"), Lauren Carberry, and Robin Brennan-Seibel violated her rights under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ("Title VII"), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., The Civil Rights Act of 1866 ("Section 1981"), 42 U.S.C. § 1981, and

  7. Alzawahra v. Albany Med. Ctr.

    11-CV-227 (N.D.N.Y. Oct. 31, 2012)   Cited 4 times

    11-CV-227 10-31-2012 WAEL F. ALZAWAHRA, Plaintiff, v. ALBANY MEDICAL CENTER, DAVID JOURD'HEUIL and HAROLD A. SINGER, Defendants. Thomas J. Mcavoy THOMAS J. McAVOY, Senior United States District Judge DECISION & ORDER 1. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Wael F. Alzawahra commenced this action pro se asserting that he was subjected to a hostile work environment, treated in a disparate fashion regarding terms and conditions of employment, and terminated from his employment based on consideration of his national

  8. Am. Gen. Life Ins. Co. v. Diana Spira 2005 Irrevocable Life Ins. Trust

    08-cv-06843 (NSR) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 25, 2014)   Cited 2 times

    08-cv-06843 (NSR) 11-25-2014 AMERICAN GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. DIANA SPIRA 2005 IRREVOCABLE LIFE INSURANCE TRUST, AARON AZRYLEWITZ, as Trustee, and SIMON SPIRA, Defendants. NELSON S. ROMÁN, United States District Judge OPINION AND ORDER NELSON S. ROMÁN, United States District Judge: Plaintiff American General Life Insurance Company ("American General") commenced this action by complaint filed July 31, 2008, against Defendants Diana Spira 2005 Irrevocable Life Insurance


    99 Civ. 3873 (LMM) (consolidated cases). (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 14, 2009)   Cited 3 times

    99 Civ. 3873 (LMM) (consolidated cases). Consolidated cases include 99 Civ. 3873, 01 Civ. 8906, 01 Civ. 9406, and 04 Civ. 1572. July 14, 2009 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER LAWRENCE McKENNA, District Judge Plaintiffs Herbert Hinnant ("Hinnant"), Edward Ebanks ("Ebanks") and Michael Nichols ("Nichols"), (collectively "Plaintiffs") move to strike various portions of Defendant's Statement of Undisputed Facts pursuant to Local Rule 56.1 ("Defs.' 56.1 Statement"). 1. Plaintiffs move to exclude paragraphs 45 through

  10. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 278,986 times   127 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit