10 Cited authorities

Weinstock v. Columbia University
224 F.3d 33 (2d Cir. 2000) Cited 2,467 times
Holding that "unsupported allegations do not create a material issue of fact"
Berry v. Marchinkowski
137 F. Supp. 3d 495 (S.D.N.Y. 2015) Cited 148 times
Holding that if probable cause existed at the time of arrest, "it continues to exist at the time of prosecution unless undermined by the discovery of some intervening fact"
Alzawahra v. Albany Med. Ctr.
546 F. App'x 53 (2d Cir. 2013) Cited 26 times
Declining to rule on discovery disputes raised for the first time in opposition to summary judgment motion
Novak v. Waterfront Comm'n of N.Y. Harbor
928 F. Supp. 2d 723 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) Cited 19 times
In Novak, there was no evidence that the defendant supervisor had made any sexual advances towards the plaintiff after their breakup, and therefore plaintiff did not have an actionable Title VII claim.
Continental Insurance Co. v. Atlantic Casualty Ins. Co.
07 Civ. 3635 (DC) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 4, 2009) Cited 14 times
07 Civ. 3635 (DC). June 4, 2009 COZEN O'CONNOR, Attorneys for Plaintiff, By: Erick J. Kirker, Esq., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. NIXON PEABODY LLP, Attorneys for Defendant, By: Aidan M. McCormack, Esq., Erik W. Drewniak, Esq., New York, New York. MEMORANDUM DECISION DENNY CHIN, District Judge This case arises out of a June 1, 2004 fire that severely damaged the Pelham Manor, New York home of Donald and Cecile Swallow (the "Swallows"). The fire was caused by the alleged negligence of Wodraska Brothers
Am. Gen. Life Ins. Co. v. Diana Spira 2005 Irrevocable Life Ins. Trust
08-cv-06843 (NSR) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 25, 2014) Cited 4 times
Granting motion to strike from Rule 56.1 submission argumentative statements and purported factual statements unsupported by any citation to the record
Borrelli v. Orange Reg'l Med. Ctr.
18 CV 270 (VB) (S.D.N.Y. May. 23, 2018)
18 CV 270 (VB) 05-23-2018 ALBA BORRELLI, Plaintiff, v. ORANGE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, LAUREN CARBERRY, and ROBIN BRENNAN-SEIBEL, Defendants. Briccetti, J. OPINION AND ORDER : Plaintiff Alba Borrelli brings this action alleging defendants Orange Regional Medical Center ("ORMC"), Lauren Carberry, and Robin Brennan-Seibel violated her rights under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ("Title VII"), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., The Civil Rights Act of 1866 ("Section 1981"), 42 U.S.C. § 1981, and
Alzawahra v. Albany Med. Ctr.
11-CV-227 (N.D.N.Y. Oct. 31, 2012) Cited 4 times
11-CV-227 10-31-2012 WAEL F. ALZAWAHRA, Plaintiff, v. ALBANY MEDICAL CENTER, DAVID JOURD'HEUIL and HAROLD A. SINGER, Defendants. Thomas J. Mcavoy THOMAS J. McAVOY, Senior United States District Judge DECISION & ORDER 1. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Wael F. Alzawahra commenced this action pro se asserting that he was subjected to a hostile work environment, treated in a disparate fashion regarding terms and conditions of employment, and terminated from his employment based on consideration of his national
BEY v. CITY OF NEW YORK
99 Civ. 3873 (LMM) (consolidated cases). (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 14, 2009) Cited 3 times
99 Civ. 3873 (LMM) (consolidated cases). Consolidated cases include 99 Civ. 3873, 01 Civ. 8906, 01 Civ. 9406, and 04 Civ. 1572. July 14, 2009 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER LAWRENCE McKENNA, District Judge Plaintiffs Herbert Hinnant ("Hinnant"), Edward Ebanks ("Ebanks") and Michael Nichols ("Nichols"), (collectively "Plaintiffs") move to strike various portions of Defendant's Statement of Undisputed Facts pursuant to Local Rule 56.1 ("Defs.' 56.1 Statement"). 1. Plaintiffs move to exclude paragraphs 45 through
Rule 56 - Summary Judgment
Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 Cited 328,261 times 158 Legal Analyses
Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

Narrative Ark Entertainment LLC v. Archie Comic Publications, Inc. et al

10 Cited authorities

Holding that "unsupported allegations do not create a material issue of fact"

Holding that if probable cause existed at the time of arrest, "it continues to exist at the time of prosecution unless undermined by the discovery of some intervening fact"

Declining to rule on discovery disputes raised for the first time in opposition to summary judgment motion

In Novak, there was no evidence that the defendant supervisor had made any sexual advances towards the plaintiff after their breakup, and therefore plaintiff did not have an actionable Title VII claim.

Granting motion to strike from Rule 56.1 submission argumentative statements and purported factual statements unsupported by any citation to the record

Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit