§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of Kelley S. Boyd, Respondent,v.New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, et al., Appellants.

Brief

8 Cited authorities

  1. Grimm v. State

    2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 7379 (N.Y. 2010)   Cited 245 times
    Vacating DHCR's denial of overcharge petition and remanding to consider fraud allegations and the reliability of the base date rent where the landlord had significantly increased the rent, offered leases without a rent stabilization rider, required tenants to make improvements at their own expense or pay increased rent, and failed to register the apartment for several years until after service of the complaint

  2. Thornton v. Baron

    5 N.Y.3d 175 (N.Y. 2005)   Cited 202 times
    Finding that tenants alleging rent overcharge may evaluate documents exceeding four-year statute of limitations implemented by RSC § 26-516 to prevent landlord's fraud

  3. Drucker v. Mauro

    30 A.D.3d 37 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)   Cited 92 times
    In Drucker, the parties entered into a lease and rider pursuant to which the plaintiff's rented an apartment from the defendant.

  4. Manocherian v. Lenox Hosp

    84 N.Y.2d 385 (N.Y. 1994)   Cited 72 times
    Considering regulatory taking claim under New York's Constitution

  5. Davis v. Waterside Housing Company

    274 A.D.2d 318 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)   Cited 60 times
    In Davis, the Court held that the trial court should have dismissed a complaint by tenants seeking a declaratory judgment that their apartments were subject to rent stabilization, observing that rent regulation issues are matters routinely within DHCR's area of expertise.

  6. Boyd v. N.Y. State Div. of Hous. & Cmty. Renewal

    110 A.D.3d 594 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)   Cited 22 times

    2013-10-29 In re Kelley S. BOYD, Petitioner–Appellant, v. NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY RENEWAL, et al., Respondents–Respondents, C–Uptown Realty, et al., Respondents. Kelley S. Boyd, appellant pro se. Gary R. Connor, New York (Jack Kuttner of counsel), for New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, respondent. MAZZARELLI Kelley S. Boyd, appellant pro se.Gary R. Connor, New York (Jack Kuttner of counsel), for New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal

  7. 390 West End Associates v. Harel

    298 A.D.2d 11 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)   Cited 33 times

    5578 July 11, 2002 Plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.), entered May 18, 2001, which denied its motion to vacate a 1988 consent judgment purporting to recognize and validate the non-primary residence status of the subject apartment. Magda L. Cruz, of counsel (Jay H. Berg and Howard Wenig, on the brief, Belkin Burden Wenig Goldman, LLP, attorneys) for plaintiff-appellant, H. Richard Penn, of counsel (Daniel J. Ansell, on the brief, Greenberg Traurig

  8. Hooker v. Eagle Bank of Rochester

    30 N.Y. 83 (N.Y. 1864)   Cited 22 times

    January Term, 1864 ____ ____, for the appellant. T.C. Montgomery, for the respondent. MULLIN, J. Proof was given, on the trial, tending to prove an express contract by the defendant to employ Kauffman Bissel as architects to make plans, c., for the new building, and to pay them therefor the sum of $1,000. The jury, by finding for the plaintiff $500 only, must have found there was no express promise to pay K. B. $1,000, but they have found an agreement to employ them; that they, K. B., have performed