In the Matter of Brooke S. B., Respondent,v.Elizabeth A. C.C., Respondent.--------------------------------R. Thomas Rankin, Esq., Attorney for the Child, Appellant.
576 U.S. 644 (2015) Cited 848 times 60 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Fourteenth Amendment protects the right of same-sex couples to marry in light of doctrinal developments, as well as fundamentally changed social understanding
In Bennett, we held that the State "may not deprive a parent of the custody of a child absent surrender, abandonment, persisting neglect, unfitness or other like extraordinary circumstances" (40 NY2d at 544).
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 5238 (N.Y. 2006) Cited 279 times
Explaining that equitable estoppel protects a party who, "while justifiably relying on the opposing party's actions, has been misled into a detrimental change of position"
In Bing, the New York Court of Appeals held that a criminal defendant, who had been represented by counsel on prior pending unrelated charges, was not deprived of the right to counsel under the State Constitution where, in the absence of counsel, the defendant waived his or her Miranda rights and made statements in response to police questioning on matters unrelated to the prior pending charge.
Finding constitutional prohibition against use of statements taken without notice to defense counsel, buttressing suppression and reversal with discussion of DR 7-104 violation
Holding that non-biological parent of child conceived through artificial insemination, but who cared for the child from birth, had standing to seek custody of the child
285 U.S. 393 (1932) Cited 358 times 5 Legal Analyses
Recognizing that stare decisis is "usually the wise policy" because consistency and reliance interests are significant, but explaining that the Supreme Court has never hesitated to overrule prior decisions where "correction . . . is practically impossible" (citations and footnotes omitted)