§Why CasetextPricing

Aurora Loan Services, LLC, Respondent,v.Monique Taylor,, et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Brief

33 Cited authorities

  1. Sprint Communications Co. v. APCC Services, Inc.

    554 U.S. 269 (2008)   Cited 782 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a federal cause of action that permitted payphone operators to seek compensation from long-distance carriers for certain calls was assignable

  2. Wells Fargo v. Mastropaolo

    42 A.D.3d 239 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)   Cited 520 times
    Holding "in a mortgage foreclosure action where defendant mortgagor raised the standing issue . . . for the first time in an attorney's affirmation submitted in opposition to plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, defendant waived the issue"

  3. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. Spanos

    102 A.D.3d 909 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)   Cited 398 times
    Holding that without an affidavit of service, lender was not entitled to dismiss the affirmative defense of non-compliance with RPAPL § 1304

  4. Bain v. Metro. Mortg. Grp., Inc.

    175 Wn. 2d 83 (Wash. 2012)   Cited 316 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “MERS is an ineligible “ ‘beneficiary’ ” within the terms of the Washington Deed of Trust Act' if it never held the promissory note or other debt instrument secured by the deed of trust,” and that “characterizing MERS as the beneficiary has the capacity to deceive” and may give rise to an action under the Consumer Protection Act

  5. Bank of Am., N.A. v. Greenleaf

    2014 Me. 89 (Me. 2014)   Cited 238 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that to comply with the statute, a notice of default must state the precise amount that the mortgagor must pay to cure the default, without allowing for accrual of any additional amount during the cure period

  6. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. Pietranico

    102 A.D.3d 724 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)   Cited 144 times

    2013-01-16 DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, etc., respondent, v. Khouloud PIETRANICO, appellant, et al., defendants. Jeffrey L. Solomon, PLLC, Woodbury, N.Y., for appellant. Frenkel, Lambert, Weiss, Weisman & Gordon, LLP, Bay Shore, N.Y. (Joseph Battista and Timothy M. Riselvato of counsel), for respondent. Jeffrey L. Solomon, PLLC, Woodbury, N.Y., for appellant. Frenkel, Lambert, Weiss, Weisman & Gordon, LLP, Bay Shore, N.Y. (Joseph Battista and Timothy M. Riselvato of counsel), for respondent

  7. Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. Gales

    116 A.D.3d 723 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)   Cited 110 times
    Holding that the borrower "did not have standing to assert noncompliance with the subject lender's pooling service agreement" as a defense to foreclosure

  8. In Matter of Merscorp v. Romaine

    2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 9500 (N.Y. 2006)   Cited 131 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that New York county clerks are required to record and index mortgages and assignments listing MERS as the lender's nominee or mortgagee of record

  9. Mortg. Elec. Registration Sys., Inc. v. Saunders

    2010 Me. 79 (Me. 2010)   Cited 118 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that MERS lacked standing to foreclose as the lender's nominee

  10. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Weinman

    123 A.D.3d 1108 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)   Cited 98 times

    2014-12-31 U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, etc., respondent, v. Caroline Waloski WEINMAN, appellant, et al., defendant. Amed Marzano & Sediva PLLC, New York, N.Y. (Naved Amed and Alexander Sediva of counsel; Dana Cimera on the brief), for appellant. Hogan Lovells U.S. LLP, New York, N.Y. (David Dunn, Nicole E. Schiavo, and Chava Brandriss of counsel), for respondent. REINALDO E. RIVERA Amed Marzano & Sediva PLLC, New York, N.Y. (Naved Amed and Alexander Sediva of counsel; Dana Cimera on the brief)