§Why CasetextPricing

Daniel Capruso, et al., Respondents,v.Village of Kings Point, et al., Appellants.--------------------------------State of New York, Respondent, v. Village of Kings Point, Appellant.

Brief

16 Cited authorities

  1. Telegraphers v. Ry. Express Agency

    321 U.S. 342 (1944)   Cited 661 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding the principles of J.I. Case apply to RLA cases

  2. Friends of Van Cortland Park, v. City of New York

    95 N.Y.2d 623 (N.Y. 2001)   Cited 77 times
    Alienating parkland "requires the direct and specific approval of the State Legislature, plainly conferred"

  3. Dwyer v. Mazzola

    171 A.D.2d 726 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)   Cited 90 times

    March 11, 1991 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brucia, J.). Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, with costs, those branches of the appellant's motion which were for leave to conduct supplemental depositions of the plaintiffs John Dwyer and Anne Dwyer and for a supplemental physical examination of the plaintiff Matthew Dwyer are granted, and the depositions and physical examination shall be held at a time and place to be specified in a written notice of at least

  4. Blanco v. AT&T Co.

    90 N.Y.2d 757 (N.Y. 1997)   Cited 73 times
    Holding that personal injury claim arising from repetitive stress injuries accrued at the time the plaintiffs began experiencing symptoms, but not at the time they discovered the nature of their injuries

  5. In the Matter of Jones v. Amicone

    27 A.D.3d 465 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)   Cited 33 times

    2004-05795. March 7, 2006. In a hybrid proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent City Council of the City of Yonkers dated June 27, 2003, which adopted a final environmental impact statement pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, and a special ordinance enacted October 16, 2003, authorizing and directing the respondent City of Yonkers to acquire certain properties, and an action for a judgment declaring that the respondent City of Yonkers

  6. Meyer v. Frank

    550 F.2d 726 (2d Cir. 1977)   Cited 83 times
    Stating that "[i]t is well settled that the federal courts have the power to toll statutes of limitations borrowed from state law in appropriate circumstances"

  7. Powell v. City of New York

    85 A.D.3d 429 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)   Cited 21 times

    No. 4845. June 7, 2011. Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Michael D. Stallman, J.), entered January 27, 2010, which granted defendants' motions for summary judgment, denied plaintiffs' cross motion for summary judgment, and declared that neither Asphalt Green nor Bobby Wagner Walk is subject to the public trust doctrine, and therefore, the City of New York is not required to obtain legislative approval before commencing demolition, construction or operation of an access

  8. In re Angiolillo v. Town of Greenburgh

    290 A.D.2d 1 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)   Cited 31 times
    Finding that parklike land was for parkway use, and not public park, and thus no approval was needed

  9. Weiss v. Mayflower Doughnut Corp.

    1 N.Y.2d 310 (N.Y. 1956)   Cited 132 times
    Holding in a lawsuit to enforce a restrictive covenant that the defendant could not assert laches given that he knew that the plaintiff would seek to enforce the covenant

  10. In re Barresi

    72 A.D.3d 1076 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)   Cited 11 times

    No. 2009-02973. April 27, 2010. In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, in the nature of mandamus to compel a final determination by the respondents as to the petitioner's request for back pay and credit for sick leave time under General Municipal Law § 207-c, the petitioner appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Kerins, J.), dated December 1, 2008, which granted the respondents' motion to dismiss the petition pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a)