§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of the Board of Managers of French Oaks Condominium, Respondent,v.Town of Amherst, et al., Appellants, Williamsville Central School District, Intervenor-Respondent.

Brief

54 Cited authorities

  1. 300 Gramatan v. Human Rights

    45 N.Y.2d 176 (N.Y. 1978)   Cited 2,303 times
    In 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights (45 NY2d 176), we stated that "substantial evidence consists of proof within the whole record of such quality and quantity as to generate conviction in and persuade a fair and detached fact finder that, from that proof as a premise, a conclusion or ultimate fact may be extracted reasonably — probatively and logically" (id. at 181).

  2. FMC Corp. v. Unmack

    92 N.Y.2d 179 (N.Y. 1998)   Cited 231 times

    92 N.Y.2d 179 699 N.E.2d 893, 677 N.Y.S.2d 269 In the Matter of FMC CORPORATION (PEROXYGEN CHEMICALS DIVISION), Appellant, v. David UNMACK, as Assessor of Town of Tonawanda, et al., Respondents, et al., Intervenor-Respondent. In the Matter of SOUTH SLOPE HOLDING CORP. et al., Appellants, v. BOARD OF ASSESSMENT REVIEW OF the TOWN OF JERUSALEM et al., Respondents. (Appeal No. 1.) In the Matter of SOUTH SLOPE HOLDING CORP. et al., Appellants, v. BOARD OF ASSESSMENT REVIEW OF the TOWN OF JERUSALEM et

  3. Matott v. Ward

    48 N.Y.2d 455 (N.Y. 1979)   Cited 354 times
    Discussing formulation of medical expert's opinion regarding causation, and holding that the issue of causation was properly presented to the jury although the expert testified that he could not say with certainty that car accident was sole cause of plaintiff's condition

  4. Wagman v. Bradshaw

    292 A.D.2d 84 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)   Cited 121 times
    In Wagman v Bradshaw (292 AD2d 84, 91 [2d Dept 2002]), the Court held that the trial court "committed reversible error in permitting the plaintiff's expert, who presented the only medical testimony offered on the plaintiff's case-in-chief, to testify as to the interpretation of MRI films, as set forth in a written report of a nontestifying healthcare professional, for the truth of the matters asserted in the report."

  5. Glenbriar Co v. Lipsman

    2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 7730 (N.Y. 2005)   Cited 77 times
    Listing of out-of-state address as primary residence in tax returns not fatal to claim of primary residence in New York

  6. Price v. New York City Housing Authority

    92 N.Y.2d 553 (N.Y. 1998)   Cited 93 times
    Referring to NYCHA as a "public entity"

  7. In re City of Syracuse Industrial Development Agency

    20 A.D.3d 168 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)   Cited 49 times

    CA 04-01506. June 10, 2005. CROSS APPEALS from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Charles T. Major, J.), entered February 13, 2004 in a proceeding pursuant to EDPL article 5. The judgment awarded respondents $433,220, together with interest and costs. Hiscock Barclay, LLP, Buffalo ( Mark R. McNamara of counsel), for appellant-respondent. Law Offices of Robert A. Gladstone, Belle Mead, New Jersey ( Robert A. Gladstone of the New Jersey Bar, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel), for r

  8. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. State

    103 A.D.2d 211 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)   Cited 53 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Chase Manhattan Bank v State of New York (103 AD2d 211), this Court held that property taken in condemnation must be valued as restricted in use by wetlands regulations, but that an owner who could prove a reasonable probability of successfully challenging the application of the regulations as an unconstitutional taking of its property would be entitled to an increment, representing the premium that a knowledgeable buyer would be willing to pay for a potential change to a more valuable use.

  9. People v. First American Corp.

    2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 8450 (N.Y. 2011)   Cited 14 times
    Treating compliance with OCC regulation 12 C.F.R § 34.44 as relevant to an appraisal service provider's compliance with Title XI of FIRREA

  10. Robert Riccio v. Owners

    79 A.D.3d 998 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)   Cited 14 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 2009-11456. December 21, 2010. In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Solomon, J.), entered November 2, 2009, which, upon the withdrawal of his causes of action alleging common-law negligence and violations of Labor Law §§ 200 and 241 (6) and upon an order of the same court dated March 10, 2009, in effect, granting the defendants' application to preclude the testimony of the plaintiff's expert, is in favor

  11. Section 202.59 - Tax assessment review proceedings in counties outside the City of New York; special rules

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 202.59   Cited 162 times

    (a) Applicability. This section shall apply to every tax assessment review proceeding brought pursuant to title 1 of article 7 of the Real Property Tax Law in counties outside the City of New York. (b) Statement of income and expenses. Before the note of issue and certificate of readiness may be filed, the petitioner shall have served on the respondent, in triplicate, a statement that the property is not income-producing, or a copy of a verified or certified statement of the income and expenses on

  12. Section 1106.1 - Appraisal standards

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 19 § 1106.1   Cited 11 times

    (a) Every appraisal assignment shall be conducted and communicated in accordance with the provisions and standards set forth in the 2024 edition of the UNIFORM STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL APPRAISAL PRACTICE (USPAP). (b) The 2024 edition of the UNIFORM STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL APPRAISAL PRACTICE (USPAP) is published by the Appraisal Foundation, which is authorized by the United States Congress as the source of appraisal standards. Copies may be obtained from: The Appraisal Foundation 1155 15th Street