9 Cited authorities

  1. Matter of Featherstone v. Franco

    95 N.Y.2d 550 (N.Y. 2000)   Cited 385 times
    Affirming rejection of Article 78 case
  2. Grimm v. State

    2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 7379 (N.Y. 2010)   Cited 245 times
    Vacating DHCR's denial of overcharge petition and remanding to consider fraud allegations and the reliability of the base date rent where the landlord had significantly increased the rent, offered leases without a rent stabilization rider, required tenants to make improvements at their own expense or pay increased rent, and failed to register the apartment for several years until after service of the complaint
  3. Schorr v. New York

    2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 2083 (N.Y. 2008)   Cited 97 times
    Holding that a city housing agency was not estopped from evicting a tenant who did not meet eligibility requirements by its purported acquiescence in his occupancy for several years
  4. Matter of Dworman v. New York State D.H.C.R

    94 N.Y.2d 359 (N.Y. 1999)   Cited 95 times
    Holding that despite the statutory requirement that a tenant respond to a luxury deregulation income request within 60 days, failure to timely comply does not automatically result in vacancy decontrol if tenant has good cause for responding late
  5. In Matter of Cintron

    2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 7376 (N.Y. 2010)   Cited 68 times
    In Cintron, the Court of Appeals held that the “four-year limitations/look-back period” applicable to rent overcharge claims does not preclude the agency from considering previously issued rent reduction orders which remain in effect during that period (id. at 355–56, 912 N.Y.S.2d 498, 938 N.E.2d 931).
  6. Matter Human Rights

    70 N.Y.2d 100 (N.Y. 1987)   Cited 107 times
    In Matter of State Div. of Human Rights (Granelle) (70 N.Y.2d 100, 107) we stated that "[e]mployment may not be denied based on speculation and mere possibilities, especially when such determination is premised solely on the fact of an applicant's inclusion in a class of persons with a particular disability rather than upon an individualized assessment of the specific individual."
  7. Versailles Realty Co. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal

    76 N.Y.2d 325 (N.Y. 1990)   Cited 45 times

    Argued June 6, 1990 Decided June 28, 1990 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, Joan M. Durante, J. Allen H. Weiss and Michael W. Gunzburg for appellants. Iris J. Korman, Dennis B. Hasher and Rudolph Rosa Di Sant for respondent. KAYE, J. A regulation promulgated by the Division of Housing and Community Renewal (the DHCR) which prohibits rent increases for major capital improvements (MCI's) funded out of the cash reserve fund established by a newly

  8. Section 1727-8.2 - Vacating of apartment by tenant

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 9 § 1727-8.2   Cited 46 times

    (a) Unless otherwise prohibited by occupancy restrictions based upon income limitations pursuant to Federal or State law, regulations or other requirements of governmental agencies, if a tenant or cooperator has permanently vacated their dwelling unit, any family member, as defined in section 1700.2(a)(7) of this Title, who meets all of the following requirements shall be entitled to be named as a tenant on the lease and/or as a stockholder on the stock certificate of such unit. Such family members

  9. Section 1727-8.3 - Special succession provisions in the event of the death of a tenant/cooperator

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 9 § 1727-8.3   Cited 29 times

    (a) Where a tenant/cooperator has died, the lease and the shares of stock for such decedent's apartment shall be surrendered by the decedent's estate or survivors for redemption. The housing company upon written request received from any member of such tenant's or cooperator's family who has resided with the tenant or cooperator in the dwelling unit as a primary residence and pursuant to the provisions of this section and the Private Housing Finance Law, shall sell or transfer the shares and the