61 Cited authorities

  1. Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.

    467 U.S. 986 (1984)   Cited 896 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Missouri law, which follows the Restatement of Torts, creates cognizable property right in trade secrets
  2. Mandarin v. Wildenstein

    2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 741 (N.Y. 2011)   Cited 1,184 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that adequately pleading unjust enrichment requires a plaintiff to allege "that the other party was enriched, at that party's expense, and that it is against equity and good conscience to permit the other party to retain what is sought to be recovered"
  3. Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Co.

    282 U.S. 555 (1931)   Cited 1,056 times
    Holding that juries should be permitted to form a "reasonable and probable estimate" of damages when the precise amount of damages is uncertain
  4. Wellogix, Inc. v. Accenture, L.L.P.

    716 F.3d 867 (5th Cir. 2013)   Cited 156 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding sufficient evidence of improper acquisition existed when parties entered into confidential agreements that gave the offending party access to the alleged trade secret materials
  5. Paramount Film Distr. v. State of N.Y

    30 N.Y.2d 415 (N.Y. 1972)   Cited 445 times

    Argued March 20, 1972 Decided June 8, 1972 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, HENRY W. LENGYEL, J. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General ( Grace K. Banoff and Ruth Kessler Toch of counsel), for appellant. John R. Davison and Walter J. Josiah, Jr. for respondent. BREITEL, J. Claimant, a motion picture distributor, seeks recovery of $128,322.50 in motion picture license fees paid to the State from June 10, 1959 to June 10, 1965 when the applicable

  6. Thyroff v. Nationwide

    2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 2442 (N.Y. 2007)   Cited 160 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that computer files could be the subject of a conversion claim, where plaintiff was entirely denied use of those files
  7. M.D. Mark, Inc. v. Kerr-McGee Corp.

    565 F.3d 753 (10th Cir. 2009)   Cited 149 times
    Holding that, where it is unclear whether a motion is made under rule 50(b) or rule 59, and the party seeking relief failed to properly preserve arguments by a mid-trial motion for judgment as a matter of law under rule 50, "[t]hat leaves only the possibility of Rule 50 relief"
  8. Dresser-Rand Co. v. Virtual Automation Inc.

    361 F.3d 831 (5th Cir. 2004)   Cited 144 times
    Holding that "this Court is bound to disregard any errors, including the admission of expert testimony, that do not affect the substantial rights of the parties"
  9. Ajaxo Inc. v. E*Trade Group Inc.

    135 Cal.App.4th 21 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 125 times
    Holding that disclosure or use of a trade secret in violation of a nondisclosure agreement is disclosure or use by improper means
  10. Matter of Rothko

    43 N.Y.2d 305 (N.Y. 1977)   Cited 220 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that where it is impossible to appraise damages with certainty, the Surrogate "had the right to resort to reasonable conjectures and probable estimates and to make the best approximation possible through the exercise of good judgment and common sense in arriving at that amount"
  11. Section 5001 - Interest to verdict, report or decision

    N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 5001   Cited 1,763 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Allowing prejudgment interest in contract cases
  12. Section 500.27 - Discretionary proceedings to review certified questions from Federal courts and other courts of last resort

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 500.27   Cited 200 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Listing courts from which the New York Court of Appeals will accept certified questions