27 Cited authorities

  1. People v. Mobil Oil Corp.

    48 N.Y.2d 192 (N.Y. 1979)   Cited 148 times
    Posting of signs
  2. Johnson v. Buffalo Indus

    84 N.Y.2d 13 (N.Y. 1994)   Cited 60 times

    84 N.Y.2d 13 636 N.E.2d 1394, 613 N.Y.S.2d 861 In the Matter of the Claim of Roosevelt T. JOHNSON, Respondent, v. BUFFALO & ERIE COUNTY PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL, et al., Appellants. Workers' Compensation Board, Respondent. New York Court of Appeals June 21, 1994. [613 N.Y.S.2d 862] Carl D. Copps, Albany, and Raymond C. Green, New York City, for appellants. Paul Shatkin, Buffalo, for Roosevelt T. Johnson, respondent. Paul A. Crotty, Corp. Counsel of New York City, Brooklyn (Larry A. Sonnenshein, Steven

  3. Selective Ins. Co. of Am. v. State Workers' Comp. Bd.

    102 A.D.3d 72 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)   Cited 22 times

    2012-11-1 In the Matter of SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA et al., Appellants, v. STATE of New York WORKERS' COMPENSATION BOARD et al., Respondents. Featherstonhaugh, Wiley & Clyne, LLP, Albany (Stephen J. Wiley of counsel), for appellants. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Paul Groenwegen of counsel), for respondents. SPAIN Featherstonhaugh, Wiley & Clyne, LLP, Albany (Stephen J. Wiley of counsel), for appellants. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Paul Groenwegen

  4. Held v. State of New York Workers' Compensation Board

    85 A.D.3d 35 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)   Cited 18 times
    Suggesting that the assessments for the Workers' Compensation Board charge and the Special Disability Fund charge are imposed directly upon the respective insurers
  5. Van Wert v. Randall

    100 A.D.3d 1079 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)   Cited 12 times

    2012-11-1 Melissa VAN WERT, Appellant, v. Elizabeth RANDALL et al., Respondents. Athari & Associates, LLC, Utica (Mo Athari of counsel), for appellant. Horigan, Horigan & Lombardo, PC, Amsterdam (Peter M. Califano of counsel), for respondents. McCARTHY Athari & Associates, LLC, Utica (Mo Athari of counsel), for appellant. Horigan, Horigan & Lombardo, PC, Amsterdam (Peter M. Califano of counsel), for respondents. Before: LAHTINEN, J.P., MALONE JR., STEIN, McCARTHY and GARRY, JJ. McCARTHY, J. Appeal

  6. Matter of Gilson v. National Union Fire Ins. Co.

    246 A.D.2d 897 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)   Cited 28 times

    January 22, 1998 Appeal from the Supreme Court (Canfield, J.). Petitioner Janet Q. Gilson was injured in an automobile accident which occurred in the course of her employment. In October 1995 without the consent of respondent, the employer's workers' compensation carrier, petitioners settled their action against the driver of the other vehicle, who carried liability limits in the amount of $100,000 per person and $300,000 per accident, for $70,000. In June 1996, petitioners sought approval of the

  7. In re Matthew Pante

    73 A.D.3d 1394 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)   Cited 13 times

    No. 503774. May 27, 2010. Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (McDonough, J.), entered April 25, 2007 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. Mark Wolf, Hackettstown, New Jersey, appellant pro se. Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Owen Demuth of counsel), for respondent. Before: Peters, J.P., Rose, Malone

  8. In re Charles A. Catapano

    73 A.D.3d 1361 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)   Cited 9 times

    No. 507895. May 20, 2010. Malone Jr., J. Appeal from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed November 24, 2008, which, among other things, found that the Special Disability Fund's consent to a third-party settlement was not required. Steven M. Licht, Special Funds Conservation Committee, Albany (Jill B. Singer of counsel), for appellant. Gregory J. Allen, State Insurance Fund, Melville (Janis M. Riekstins of counsel), for State Insurance Fund and another, respondents. Estelle Kraushar

  9. Medina v. Phillips

    88 A.D.3d 524 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)   Cited 7 times

    2011-10-18 Philip MEDINA, Plaintiff–Appellant,v.Patrick PHILLIPS, et al., Defendants.First Cardinal Corporation, LLC, Nonparty–Respondent. Law Office of Andrew Laufer, PLLC, New York (Andrew C. Laufer and Stephen D. Chakwin, Jr. of counsel), for appellant.Stewart, Greenblatt, Manning & Baez, Syosset (Lisa Levine of counsel), for respondent. MAZZARELLI, J.P., SWEENY, FREEDMAN, MANZANET–DANIELS, ROMÁN, JJ. Law Office of Andrew Laufer, PLLC, New York (Andrew C. Laufer and Stephen D. Chakwin, Jr. of

  10. Rodriguez v. New Sans Souci, N.H.

    98 A.D.3d 1205 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)   Cited 6 times

    2012-09-27 In the Matter of the Claim of Juan RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. NEW SANS SOUCI, N.H., et al., Respondents. Workers' Compensation Board, Respondent. Law Office of Joseph A. Romano, New York City (Mark Du of counsel), for appellant. Jones Jones, LLC, New York City (Sarah A. Thomas of counsel), for New Sans Souci, N.H. and another, respondents. KAVANAGH Law Office of Joseph A. Romano, New York City (Mark Du of counsel), for appellant. Jones Jones, LLC, New York City (Sarah A. Thomas of counsel)

  11. Section 500.22 - Motions for permission to appeal in civil cases

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 500.22   Cited 43 times

    (a) Filing and notice. In addition to the submission in digital format required by subsection 500.22(e) of this section, movant shall file an original and one copy of its motion, unless permitted to proceed pursuant to subsection 500.21(g), with proof of service of one copy on each other party. The motion shall be noticed for a return date in compliance with CPLR 5516 and subsection 500.21(b) of this Part. (b) Content. The motion shall be a single document, bound on the left, and shall contain in

  12. Section 600.14 - Motions for reargument or leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 600.14   Cited 22 times

    (a) Reargument. Motions for reargument shall be made within 30 days after the appeal has been decided and shall be submitted without oral argument. The papers in support of the motion shall include a copy of the order entered upon the decision of this court, and shall concisely state the points claimed to have been overlooked or misapprehended by the court, with proper reference to the particular portions of the record and the authorities relied upon. (b) Leave to appeal. Applications for permission