§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of 381 Search Warrants Directed to Facebook, Inc., Facebook, Inc., Appellant,v.New York County District Attorney's Office, Respondent. (And Another Proceeding.)

Brief

12 Cited authorities

  1. Groh v. Ramirez

    540 U.S. 551 (2004)   Cited 1,861 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a warrant did not incorporate the supporting affidavit by "recit[ing] that the Magistrate was satisfied the affidavit established probable cause to believe that contraband was concealed on the premises"

  2. Molzof v. United States

    502 U.S. 301 (1992)   Cited 380 times
    Holding that § "2674 bars the recovery only of what are legally considered ‘punitive damages’ under traditional common-law principles"

  3. Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n v. City of New York

    41 N.Y.2d 205 (N.Y. 1976)   Cited 408 times

    Argued October 12, 1976 Decided December 22, 1976 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, GEORGE STARKE, J. W. Bernard Richland, Corporation Counsel (James G. Greilsheimer and L. Kevin Sheridan of counsel), New York City, for appellant. Frederick R. Livingston, Jay W. Waks and William C. Zifchak, New York City, for respondent. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (George D. Zuckerman and Samuel A. Hirshowitz of counsel), New York City, for intervenor

  4. People v. Galland

    45 Cal.4th 354 (Cal. 2008)   Cited 79 times
    Describing Hobbs procedure

  5. Microsoft Corp. v. United States (In re a Warrant to Search a Certain E–Mail Account Controlled & Maintained by Microsoft Corp.)

    829 F.3d 197 (2d Cir. 2016)   Cited 50 times   30 Legal Analyses
    Finding "that the data is stored [exclusively] in Dublin, that Microsoft will necessarily interact with the Dublin data center in order to retrieve the information for the government's benefit, and that the data is within the jurisdiction of a foreign sovereign"

  6. Anderson v. Taylor

    2006 UT 79 (Utah 2006)   Cited 14 times
    Holding that failure to file a copy of search warrants issued and their supporting documentation was likely to evade review because it would be difficult to conceive of any instance where law enforcement would not have the incentive to immediately file the supporting documents thereby rendering the claim moot

  7. Matter Cunningham v. Nadjari

    39 N.Y.2d 314 (N.Y. 1976)   Cited 52 times
    In Cunningham, however, we recognized that "on a basis of stare decisis these precedents represent a formidable line of authority, however asymmetrical may appear to be the support for the rule they express and apply" (39 NY2d at 317; see also Matter of Abrams [John Anonymous], 62 NY2d 183, 192 [1984]).

  8. People v. Marin

    86 A.D.2d 40 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)   Cited 23 times

    March 30, 1982 Appeal from the Westchester County Court, LAWRENCE N. MARTIN, JR., J. Kaye, Scholer, Fierman, Hays Handler ( Paul J. Curran and Bruce Margolius of counsel), appellant pro se. J. Radley Herold and Howard L. Dryer for respondent. Per Curiam. On December 4, 1980 a tragic and fatal fire occurred at the Stouffer Inn in Westchester County. On December 5, 1980 Stouffer engaged the law firm of Kaye, Scholer, Fierman, Hays Handler (Kaye Scholer) to represent it in all facets of both the civil

  9. Section 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

    42 U.S.C. § 1983   Cited 486,409 times   688 Legal Analyses
    Holding liable any state actor who "subjects, or causes [a person] to be subjected" to a constitutional violation

  10. Section 2701 - Unlawful access to stored communications

    18 U.S.C. § 2701   Cited 1,323 times   135 Legal Analyses
    Holding liable any person who "intentionally accesses without authorization a facility through which an electronic communication service is provided ... and thereby obtains, alters, or prevents authorized access to a wire or electronic communication while it is in electronic storage"

  11. Section 2703 - Required disclosure of customer communications or records

    18 U.S.C. § 2703   Cited 1,203 times   100 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that these providers "shall disclose" such information "when the governmental entity uses an administrative subpoena authorized by a Federal or State statute"

  12. Section 2707 - Civil action

    18 U.S.C. § 2707   Cited 457 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Granting relief to those "aggrieved by any violation of this chapter in which the conduct constituting the violation is engaged in with a knowing or intentional state of mind"