Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Envtl. Servs. (TOC), Inc.

Holding that plaintiffs who curtailed their recreational activities on a river due to reasonable concerns about the effect of pollutant discharges into that river had standing

Riley v. California

Holding that an employee had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the call records and text messages contained on a cell phone owned by his employer because he "had a right to exclude others from using the phone" and explaining that "a property interest in the item searched is only one factor in the analysis, and lack thereof is not dispositive"

Groh v. Ramirez

Holding that a warrant did not incorporate the supporting affidavit by "recit[ing] that the Magistrate was satisfied the affidavit established probable cause to believe that contraband was concealed on the premises"

Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey

Holding that a spousal notification provision was unconstitutional

County of Los Angeles v. Davis

Holding that voluntary cessation can render an issue moot if “there is no reasonable expectation ... that the alleged violation will recur”

Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court

Holding that safeguarding well-being of minor is compelling and may justify closure of criminal trial from public access

Stenberg v. Carhart

Holding unconstitutional a state law that, though it aimed to ban the "D&X" abortion procedure, was written so broadly that it prohibited D&E abortions, too, which were "the most commonly used method for performing previability second trimester abortions"

Matter Hearst Corp. v. Clyne

Holding that courts are normally precluded from considering questions that, once alive, have become moot by change of circumstances

Society of Plastics v. Suffolk

In Society of Plastics Indus. v. County of Suffolk, 77 N.Y.2d 761, 570 N.Y.S.2d 778, 573 N.E.2d 1034 (1991), this Court examined the law of standing, and set forth a framework for deciding whether parties have standing to challenge governmental action in land use matters generally, and under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (ECL art. 8 [SEQRA]), specifically.

Campbell v. Louisiana

Holding a criminal defendant "suffers a serious injury in fact because discrimination at the voir dire stage casts doubt on the integrity of the judicial process and places the fairness of a criminal proceeding in doubt"

Section 2703 - Required disclosure of customer communications or records

Recognizing that these providers "shall disclose" such information "when the governmental entity uses an administrative subpoena authorized by a Federal or State statute"

Section 2705 - Delayed notice

Requiring government to demonstrate "reason to believe" that disclosure of the warrant will "seriously jeopardiz[e] an investigation" or result in another enumerated harm

Section 500.1 - General requirements