§Why CasetextPricing

hibu Inc. v. Peck

RESPONSE

6 Cited authorities

  1. Pioneer Investment Services Company v. Brunswick Associates Limited Partnership

    507 U.S. 380 (1993)   Cited 7,860 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that clients must be held accountable for the acts and omissions of their attorneys

  2. Baker v. Promise Reg'l Med. Ctr.

    Case No. 10-CV-01257-KHV-DJW (D. Kan. Mar. 16, 2012)   Cited 6 times
    Finding excusable neglect where counsel's staff calendared deadline for the wrong date

  3. HARVEY v. VIA CHRISTI REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC.

    Case No. 05-1114-JTM-DWB (D. Kan. Feb. 28, 2006)

    Case No. 05-1114-JTM-DWB. February 28, 2006 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DONALD BOSTWICK, Magistrate Judge Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Permission to Designate Expert Witness Out of Time filed on February 8, 2006. (Doc. 44.) At a telephone status conference on February 9, 2006, the Court directed that any responses to the motion be filed on or before February 22, 2006. (Doc. 45.) None of the Defendants filed a response. Counsel for Defendant LyNette Johnson, M.D. informed the Court by letter

  4. Jones v. City of Topeka

    764 F. Supp. 1423 (D. Kan. 1991)   Cited 11 times
    Finding defendants' motion to strike plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment should be denied because court can strike pleadings but not motions

  5. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 354,229 times   943 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss

  6. Rule 7 - Pleadings Allowed; Form of Motions and Other Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 7   Cited 7,742 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Defining "pleadings" for purposes of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure