§Why CasetextPricing

Stragent, LLC v. BMW of North America, LLC et al

MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction in view of disclaimer of all patents in suit

10 Cited authorities

  1. Fresenius USA, Inc. v. Baxter International, Inc.

    721 F.3d 1330 (Fed. Cir. 2013)   Cited 166 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "when a claim is cancelled, the patentee loses any cause of action based on that claim, and any pending litigation in which the claims are asserted becomes moot"

  2. Foster v. Carson

    347 F.3d 742 (9th Cir. 2003)   Cited 184 times
    Holding that a moot claim must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction

  3. Hoganas AB v. Dresser Indus., Inc.

    9 F.3d 948 (Fed. Cir. 1994)   Cited 179 times
    Finding patentee's proposed definition unsupported in the specification or prosecution history

  4. Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. Gen-Probe Inc.

    323 F.3d 956 (Fed. Cir. 2002)   Cited 118 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Granting petition for rehearing and vacating prior panel decision reported at 285 F.3d 1013 (Fed. Cir. 2002)

  5. Standard Havens Products v. Gencor Industries

    897 F.2d 511 (Fed. Cir. 1990)   Cited 151 times
    Determining that "employee layoffs, immediate insolvency, and possible extinction" constituted irreparable harm to a company

  6. Vectra Fitness, Inc. v. TNWK Corp.

    162 F.3d 1379 (Fed. Cir. 1998)   Cited 46 times   5 Legal Analyses
    In Vectra Fitness, although the PTO added a terminal disclaimer to the prosecution history, it failed to enter the terminal disclaimer on the cover page or contents page of the prosecution history, and failed to publish the terminal disclaimer in the Offi- cial Gazette as contemplated by PTO regulations.

  7. Hologic, Inc. v. Minerva Surgical, Inc.

    325 F. Supp. 3d 507 (D. Del. 2018)   Cited 16 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Denying motion to dismiss infringement claims based on PTAB decision finding patent claims invalid

  8. Target Training Int'l, Ltd. v. Extended Disc N. Am., Inc.

    645 F. App'x 1018 (Fed. Cir. 2016)   Cited 11 times
    Upholding the district court's dismissal for lack of jurisdiction because Fresenius rendered the suit moot as to the claims cancelled after reexamination

  9. Section 253 - Disclaimer

    35 U.S.C. § 253   Cited 179 times   35 Legal Analyses
    Granting patentee authority to disclaim issued or pending claims

  10. Section 1.321 - Statutory disclaimers, including terminal disclaimers

    37 C.F.R. § 1.321   Cited 74 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Incorporating the language of § 253