§Why CasetextPricing

Stragent, LLC v. BMW of North America, LLC et al

MOTION for Summary Judgment of Invalidity and Noninfringement

7 Cited authorities

  1. Fresenius USA, Inc. v. Baxter International, Inc.

    721 F.3d 1330 (Fed. Cir. 2013)   Cited 164 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "when a claim is cancelled, the patentee loses any cause of action based on that claim, and any pending litigation in which the claims are asserted becomes moot"

  2. Inland Steel Co. v. LTV Steel Co.

    364 F.3d 1318 (Fed. Cir. 2004)   Cited 64 times
    Holding that a patent infringement defendant, who moved for dismissal after obtaining cancellation of patents through reexamination proceedings before the Patent and Trademark Office obtained a disposition on the merits in infringement action for purposes of obtaining attorney fees and costs

  3. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 328,261 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

  4. Section 285 - Attorney fees

    35 U.S.C. § 285   Cited 3,195 times   476 Legal Analyses
    Granting district courts discretion to award reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing party in exceptional cases

  5. Rule 31 - Serving and Filing Briefs

    Fed. R. App. P. 31   Cited 211 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Denying an appellee who failed to file a brief the right to be heard at oral argument

  6. Section 318 - Decision of the Board

    35 U.S.C. § 318   Cited 159 times   137 Legal Analyses
    Governing the incorporation of claims added via the operation of § 316(d)

  7. Section 90.3 - Time for appeal or civil action

    37 C.F.R. § 90.3   Cited 15 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Explaining that the applicant’s time to challenge a Board decision in an appeal or civil action starts anew after the Board’s action on rehearing