§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of Jonas Aponte, Respondent,v.Shola Olatoye,, et al., Appellants.

Brief

5 Cited authorities

  1. Home Care Ass'n of Am. v. Weil

    799 F.3d 1084 (D.C. Cir. 2015)   Cited 60 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Department's decision not to apply the exemption to employees of third-party agencies was "grounded in a reasonable interpretation of the statute and [was] neither arbitrary nor capricious"

  2. Mt. Holly Gardens Citizens in Action Inc. v. Twp. of Mount Holly

    658 F.3d 375 (3d Cir. 2011)   Cited 65 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding a housing policy had a disparate impact on minorities because "22.54% [x%] of African-American households and 32.31 % [x%] of Hispanic households in Mount Holly will be affected by the [housing policy]. The same is true for only 2.73% [y%] of White households [x is significantly greater than y]"

  3. Aponte v. Olatoye

    138 A.D.3d 440 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)   Cited 2 times

    15981, 400546/14. 04-07-2016 In re Jonas APONTE, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Shola OLATOYE, etc., et al., Respondents–Respondents. Urban Justice Center, New York (Leah Goodridge of counsel), for appellant. New York City Housing Authority, New York (Jane E. Lippman of counsel), for respondents. Urban Justice Center, New York (Leah Goodridge of counsel), for appellant. New York City Housing Authority, New York (Jane E. Lippman of counsel), for respondents. TOM, J.P., RENWICK, ANDRIAS, MOSKOWITZ, MANZANET–DANIELS

  4. Herriot v. House

    Case Number C 06-6323 JF (RS) (N.D. Cal. Jan. 29, 2009)   Cited 3 times
    Finding the plaintiff to be handicapped based partly because she suffered from dementia

  5. Section 3601 - Declaration of policy

    42 U.S.C. § 3601   Cited 3,991 times   44 Legal Analyses
    Stating the FHA is intended to provide “fair housing throughout the United States”